Jersey Judgment

Showlag v Mansour [1991] JLR 367 (23 December 1991)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court may strike out an action where the matter has already been finally determined between the same parties or their privies by a competent court, applying the doctrine of estoppel (chose jugee).

Court disposition

not specified

02

Material facts

Parties

Showlag

Applicant

Mansour

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil / Motion to Strike Out Action

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the doctrine of estoppel (chose jugee) applies to bar the present action on the basis of a prior final judgment between the same parties or their privies

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant contends that the present action should be struck out as the matter has already been adjudicated by a competent court between the same parties or their privies, and a final judgment has been delivered.
Respondent
The respondent argues that the doctrine of estoppel (chose jugee) should not apply, possibly disputing the identity of the issues or parties, or the finality of the previous judgment.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    doctrine of estoppel (chose jugee)

    A court has discretion to strike out an action if a party has already been given a full opportunity to be heard and a final judgment has been delivered by a competent court in respect of the same question between the same parties or their privies.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court may strike out an action where the matter has already been finally determined between the same parties or their privies by a competent court, applying the doctrine of estoppel (chose jugee).

Court disposition

not specified

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[1991] JLR 367

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Showlag v Mansour [1991] JLR 367 (23 December 1991) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1991/JLR910367.html Cite as: [1991] JLR 367 [ New search ] [ Help ] Showlag v Mansour 1991 JLR 367 (23 December 1991) Estoppel - chose jugee - scope of doctrine - court has discretion to strike out action if party already given full opportunity to be heard and final judgment delivered by competent court in respect of same question between same parties or their privies The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 1991 JLR 367 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1991/JLR910367.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.