Snell v Beadle [1999] JLR_Note 1c (22 April 1999)
The court must weigh the length and reasons for delay, the merits of the appeal, and any prejudice to the respondent in applications for enlargement of time to appeal.
- Parties
- Applicant: Snell; Respondent: Beadle
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 22 April 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Enlargement of Time
- Outcome
- not specified
- Legal Topics
- Enlargement of Time for Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Snell
Applicant
Beadle
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Enlargement of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 What factors should be considered when deciding an application for enlargement of time to appeal?
Ratio Decidendi
The court must weigh the length and reasons for delay, the merits of the appeal, and any prejudice to the respondent in applications for enlargement of time to appeal.
Court Disposition
not specified
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment