Jersey Judgment

St. Helier (Constable) v Gray [2004] JLR 360 (05 October 2004)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court held that the Connetable has discretion to appoint the Chef de Police and is not bound by the customary practice of appointing the most senior Centenier.

Court disposition

application granted

Orders

  • The Connetable may exercise discretion in appointing the Chef de Police.

02

Material facts

Parties

St. Helier (Constable)

Applicant

Gray

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Parochial Administration / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the Connetable has discretion to appoint the Chef de Police or is bound by the customary practice of appointing the most senior Centenier.

Party arguments

Applicant
The Connetable has discretion to choose the Chef de Police and is not bound by the customary practice of automatic appointment of the most senior Centenier.
Respondent
The customary practice (coûtume) requires the automatic appointment of the most senior Centenier as Chef de Police.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Jersey customary law as interpreted by the court

    The Connetable has discretion in the appointment of the Chef de Police; the customary practice of automatic appointment of the most senior Centenier is no longer appropriate due to the changed role of the Chef and is widely disregarded in practice.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court held that the Connetable has discretion to appoint the Chef de Police and is not bound by the customary practice of appointing the most senior Centenier.

Court disposition

application granted

  • The Connetable may exercise discretion in appointing the Chef de Police.

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2004] JLR 360

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> St. Helier (Constable) v Gray [2004] JLR 360 (05 October 2004) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2004/JLR040360.html Cite as: [2004] JLR 360 [ New search ] [ Help ] St. Helier (Constable) v Gray 2004 JLR 360 (05 October 2004) Parochial Administration-Chef de Police-appointment-Connetable has discretion to choose Chef de Police-coûtume of automatic appointment of most senior Centenier replaced-now inappropriate to changed role of Chef and widely disregarded in practice The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2004 JLR 360 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2004/JLR040360.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.