AG v Steadman and Coles [2003] JRC 182 (16 October 2003)
Steadman's sentence was reduced from the guideline starting point due to his lower-level involvement and early guilty plea; Coles avoided custody due to exceptional mitigation, including personal use for work, previous good character, and ongoing rehabilitation.
- Citation
- [2003] JRC 182
- Parties
- Defendant: Steadman; Defendant: Coles; Prosecution: Crown Advocate
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing / Sentencing After Guilty Plea and Acquittal on One Charge
- Outcome
- Steadman sentenced to 5 years' imprisonment on each count, concurrent; Coles sentenced to 240 hours community service with 2 years' imprisonment in default.
- Legal Topics
- Drug Offences, Sentencing, Mitigation, Community Service
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Steadman
Defendant
Coles
Defendant
Crown Advocate
Prosecution
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing / Sentencing After Guilty Plea and Acquittal on One Charge
Legal Issues
- 1 appropriate sentence for trafficking in Class A drugs
- 2 appropriate sentence for possession of cocaine for personal use
Ratio Decidendi
Steadman's sentence was reduced from the guideline starting point due to his lower-level involvement and early guilty plea; Coles avoided custody due to exceptional mitigation, including personal use for work, previous good character, and ongoing rehabilitation.
Court Disposition
Steadman sentenced to 5 years' imprisonment on each count, concurrent; Coles sentenced to 240 hours community service with 2 years' imprisonment in default.
Orders
- Steadman to serve 5 years' imprisonment on each count concurrently.
- Coles to perform 240 hours of community service.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment