Jersey Judgment

Sutton v Insurance Corp. C.I. Ltd. [2011] JLR 80 (27 January 2011)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Failure by insured to disclose questionable circumstances of acquisition and valuation constitutes reticence dolosive, entitling insurer to avoid the policy.

Court disposition

insurer entitled to avoid policy

Orders

  • policy avoided

02

Material facts

Parties

Sutton

Insured

Insurance Corp. C. I. Ltd.

Insurer

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Insurance Dispute / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether failure to disclose questionable circumstances of acquisition and valuation constitutes reticence dolosive entitling insurer to avoid policy

Party arguments

Applicant
Insured failed to inform insurer of questionable circumstances regarding acquisition and valuation of insured item.
Respondent
Insurer claims reticence dolosive and seeks to avoid liability under the policy.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Jersey insurance law

    Reticence dolosive entitles insurer to avoid policy for misrepresentation and non-disclosure.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Failure by insured to disclose questionable circumstances of acquisition and valuation constitutes reticence dolosive, entitling insurer to avoid the policy.

Court disposition

insurer entitled to avoid policy

  • policy avoided

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2011] JLR 80

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Sutton v Insurance Corp. C. I. Ltd. [2011] JLR 80 (27 January 2011) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2011/JLR110080.html Cite as: [2011] JLR 80 [ New search ] [ Help ] Sutton v Insurance Corp. C. I. Ltd. 2011 JLR 80 (27 January 2011) Insurance-misrepresentation and non-disclosure-insurer avoiding liability-failure of insured person to inform insurer of questionable circumstances in which obtained insured item (e.g. purchase via intermediary from unknown vendor, without receipt) and questionable valuation of item (e.g. item not with valuer when valued) is reticence dolosive entitling insurer to avoid policy The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2011 JLR 80 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2011/JLR110080.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.