AG -v- T [2016] JRC 034 (08 February 2016)

AG -v- T [2016] JRC 034 (08 February 2016)

Given the gravity of the defendant's sexual offences against a child, the risk to the community, and the lack of sufficient dependency or ongoing family life with his partner and child, the interference with Article 8 rights caused by deportation is not disproportionate. The interests of the community outweigh the defendant's and his family's rights.

Citation
[2016] JRC 034
Parties
Prosecutor: Attorney General; Defendant: T (Defendant); Interested Party: Partner of Defendant
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
08 February 2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Post Conviction Deportation Recommendation
Outcome
deportation recommended
Legal Topics
Deportation, Article 8 ECHR, Family Life, Sexual Offences, Sentencing, Proportionality

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Attorney General

Prosecutor

T (Defendant)

Defendant

Partner of Defendant

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Post Conviction Deportation Recommendation

  1. 1 Whether the defendant's deportation is proportionate under Article 8 ECHR given his family ties in Jersey and the seriousness of his offences
  2. 2 Whether the defendant's continued presence is detrimental to the public good

Ratio Decidendi

Given the gravity of the defendant's sexual offences against a child, the risk to the community, and the lack of sufficient dependency or ongoing family life with his partner and child, the interference with Article 8 rights caused by deportation is not disproportionate. The interests of the community outweigh the defendant's and his family's rights.

Court Disposition

deportation recommended

Orders

  • The defendant is recommended for deportation from Jersey upon release from custody.