AG -v- T [2016] JRC 034 (08 February 2016)
Given the gravity of the defendant's sexual offences against a child, the risk to the community, and the lack of sufficient dependency or ongoing family life with his partner and child, the interference with Article 8 rights caused by deportation is not disproportionate. The interests of the community outweigh the defendant's and his family's rights.
- Citation
- [2016] JRC 034
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Attorney General; Defendant: T (Defendant); Interested Party: Partner of Defendant
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 08 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Post Conviction Deportation Recommendation
- Outcome
- deportation recommended
- Legal Topics
- Deportation, Article 8 ECHR, Family Life, Sexual Offences, Sentencing, Proportionality
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Prosecutor
T (Defendant)
Defendant
Partner of Defendant
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Post Conviction Deportation Recommendation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant's deportation is proportionate under Article 8 ECHR given his family ties in Jersey and the seriousness of his offences
- 2 Whether the defendant's continued presence is detrimental to the public good
Ratio Decidendi
Given the gravity of the defendant's sexual offences against a child, the risk to the community, and the lack of sufficient dependency or ongoing family life with his partner and child, the interference with Article 8 rights caused by deportation is not disproportionate. The interests of the community outweigh the defendant's and his family's rights.
Court Disposition
deportation recommended
Orders
- The defendant is recommended for deportation from Jersey upon release from custody.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment