Jersey Judgment

The Attorney General v Daniel Paul Wheeler

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The bail application was refused because there had been no sufficient change of circumstances since the Court's earlier refusal in December last year. The Court considered that the anticipated delay to trial was already known and did not justify departing from the previous decision.

Court disposition

Bail refused

Orders

  • Application for bail refused.
  • A further directions hearing is to be fixed and notified to counsel.

02

Material facts

Parties

The Attorney General

Applicant/respondent Counsel: L. Sette, Esq., Crown Advocate.

Daniel Paul Wheeler

Defendant Counsel: Advocate G. F. Herold-Howes

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Bail Application / Application for Bail Refused

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Court's ex tempore judgment

    Where a bail application has been made and refused, there must be a change of circumstances before the bail application will be reconsidered.

  2. 02

    Court's ex tempore judgment

    Delay in a case should be addressed through proper case management and an earlier directions hearing where necessary.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The bail application was refused because there had been no sufficient change of circumstances since the Court's earlier refusal in December last year. The Court considered that the anticipated delay to trial was already known and did not justify departing from the previous decision.

Obiter and limits

  • The Court was troubled by the delay in the case and would arrange a further directions hearing before Commissioner Binnington.
  • Counsel were reminded of their obligation to ensure the case is properly managed, including early attention to admissions and any adverse inferences or bad character applications.

Court disposition

Bail refused

  • Application for bail refused.
  • A further directions hearing is to be fixed and notified to counsel.

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

Judgment

Application for bail refused [2025]JRC177 Royal Court (Samedi) 13 June 2025 Before : Sir William Bailhache, Commissioner, and Jurats Le Cornu and Powell The Attorney General -v- Daniel Paul Wheeler L. Sette, Esq., Crown Advocate. Advocate G. F. Herold-Howes for the Defendant.

EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT THE COMMISSIONER: 1. Mr Wheeler, the bail application is refused. It is absolutely usual practice that where a bail application has been made and has been refused, there needs to be a change of circumstances before the bail application will be reconsidered, and we do not think that there are any sufficient change of circumstances to justify the departure from the decision that was taken by the Court in December last year. It was known then that it was going to be a long delay until the trial date, and if one looks at the comments of the Learned Bailiff, he indicates, very properly, that the parties should look to get an earlier date, but the nature of things is that the Court must have considered that there might not be an earlier date and the trial would take place in November, as it now appears it will.

2. However, I do want to add that the Court is very troubled by the delay that is taking place in this case, and I am going to speak to the Bailiff’s Judicial Secretary and will fix a date which will be notified to counsel for a further directions hearing in front of Commissioner Binnington, I gather is presiding in November, because this case, if I may put it this way, needs shaking, and that counsel have an obligation to make sure the case is managed properly and that early attention is given to matters like admissions, the question of whether any adverse inferences or bad character applications and so on can be made. That needs to be dealt with soon.

3. So, bail is refused, Mr Wheeler. No Authorities

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.