AG v Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank PJSC, Jersey Branch [2018] JRC 180 (28 September 2018)

AG v Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank PJSC, Jersey Branch [2018] JRC 180 (28 September 2018)

A fine is imposed for intermeddling under Article 23(1) of the Probate (Jersey) Law 1998, taking into account mitigation and the absence of fraudulent intent.

Citation
[2018] JRC 180
Parties
Defendant: The Bank
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
28 September 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
fine and compensation ordered
Legal Topics
Intermeddling, Fines, Compensation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Bank

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

  1. 1 Whether the Bank intermeddled contrary to Article 23(1) of the Probate (Jersey) Law 1998
  2. 2 Appropriate penalty for intermeddling under the Law

Ratio Decidendi

A fine is imposed for intermeddling under Article 23(1) of the Probate (Jersey) Law 1998, taking into account mitigation and the absence of fraudulent intent.

Court Disposition

fine and compensation ordered

Orders

  • Fine of £25,000 for intermeddling
  • Compensation of £2,085.27 ordered