AG -v- Gaish 5-Dec-2006 [2006] JRC 180 (05 December 2006)
The Court was not satisfied that the defendant purchased the cannabis or that the additional sums were paid out of the proceeds of drug trafficking. The benefit is limited to the admitted sum of £34,470. The default sentence must encourage compliance, and a 2-year term is appropriate.
- Citation
- [2006] JRC 180
- Parties
- Applicant: The Crown; Respondent: Defendant
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Confiscation Order Application / Post Conviction
- Outcome
- Confiscation order granted for £34,470 with 9 months to pay; 2 years' imprisonment in default of payment.
- Legal Topics
- Drug Trafficking, Confiscation Order, Benefit From Crime, Realisable Property, Default Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Crown
Applicant
Defendant
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Confiscation Order Application / Post Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant benefited from drug trafficking beyond the admitted sum of £34,470
- 2 Whether additional sums related to the cost price of imported cannabis can be treated as proceeds of drug trafficking
- 3 Appropriate default sentence for non-payment of confiscation order
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was not satisfied that the defendant purchased the cannabis or that the additional sums were paid out of the proceeds of drug trafficking. The benefit is limited to the admitted sum of £34,470. The default sentence must encourage compliance, and a 2-year term is appropriate.
Court Disposition
Confiscation order granted for £34,470 with 9 months to pay; 2 years' imprisonment in default of payment.
Orders
- Confiscation order in the sum of £34,470
- 9 months allowed for payment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment