AG v Yuksel 23-Oct-2019 [2019] JRC 208 (23 October 2019)
There was no evidence that the monies paid to the Defendant's companies were entrusted for a specific purpose beyond ordinary business consideration for goods. Absent evidence of entrustment, a key element of fraudulent conversion was not established. Therefore, the Defendant had no case to answer.
- Citation
- [2019] JRC 208
- Parties
- Defendant: The Defendant; Prosecution: The Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 23 October 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Ruling on Submission of No Case to Answer at the Close of the Prosecution's Case
- Outcome
- Submission of no case to answer allowed; Defendant acquitted on all counts.
- Legal Topics
- Fraudulent Conversion, Entrustment, Elements of Offence, No Case to Answer
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Defendant
Defendant
The Crown
Prosecution
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Ruling on Submission of No Case to Answer at the Close of the Prosecution's Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether monies received by the Defendant's companies constituted property 'entrusted' for the purposes of fraudulent conversion
- 2 Whether the prosecution established all elements of the offence of fraudulent conversion
Ratio Decidendi
There was no evidence that the monies paid to the Defendant's companies were entrusted for a specific purpose beyond ordinary business consideration for goods. Absent evidence of entrustment, a key element of fraudulent conversion was not established. Therefore, the Defendant had no case to answer.
Court Disposition
Submission of no case to answer allowed; Defendant acquitted on all counts.
Orders
- Directed jury to return verdicts of not guilty on all counts.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment