1998/114 - Greffier of the States v Les Pas Holdings Ltd [1998] UR 114 (4 June 1998)
Leave to appeal and a stay were granted because serious issues were at stake and the Company should be permitted to consider whether it has grounds for appeal once the Royal Court's reasons are delivered, despite having had ample opportunity to prepare its challenge.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1998] UR 114
- Parties
- Applicant: The Greffier of the States; Landowner: Les Pas Holdings Ltd; Intervener: The Waterfront Enterprise Board
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 04 June 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal and Stay / Single Judge of the Court of Appeal Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal and Stay
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; stay of proceedings ordered pending delivery of reasons by the Royal Court.
- Legal Topics
- Compulsory Purchase, Vesting Order, Adjournment, Judicial Review, Case Management
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Greffier of the States
Applicant
Les Pas Holdings Ltd
Landowner
The Waterfront Enterprise Board
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal and Stay / Single Judge of the Court of Appeal Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal and Stay
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted against the Royal Court's order to proceed with the vesting order hearing
- 2 Whether a stay should be granted pending delivery of reasons for refusal of adjournment
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal and a stay were granted because serious issues were at stake and the Company should be permitted to consider whether it has grounds for appeal once the Royal Court's reasons are delivered, despite having had ample opportunity to prepare its challenge.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; stay of proceedings ordered pending delivery of reasons by the Royal Court.
Orders
- Leave to appeal against the order that the hearing proceed at 9.00am granted.
- Stay of the hearing ordered pending delivery of the Royal Court's reasons for refusing adjournment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment