AG -v- The Jersey Royal Company Limited [2012] JRC 208 (12 November 2012)

AG -v- The Jersey Royal Company Limited [2012] JRC 208 (12 November 2012)

The company committed three offences by developing land without planning permission, and the aggravating factor was the repetition of the offence after prior warning. The court imposed fines as a deterrent, considering both the company's environmental record and its inadequate response to the authorities.

Citation
[2012] JRC 208
Parties
Defendant: The Jersey Royal Company Limited; Prosecutor: Attorney-General
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
12 November 2012
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
Outcome
conviction and fines imposed
Legal Topics
Unauthorised Development, Planning Permission, Environmental Protection, Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Jersey Royal Company Limited

Defendant

Attorney-General

Prosecutor

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing Judgment

  1. 1 Whether The Jersey Royal Company Limited developed land without planning permission in breach of the Planning and Building (Jersey) Law 2002
  2. 2 Appropriate sentence for unauthorised removal of banks and/or hedgerows

Ratio Decidendi

The company committed three offences by developing land without planning permission, and the aggravating factor was the repetition of the offence after prior warning. The court imposed fines as a deterrent, considering both the company's environmental record and its inadequate response to the authorities.

Court Disposition

conviction and fines imposed

Orders

  • Fine of £3,000 on Count 1
  • Fine of £4,000 on Count 2