Representation of Ocorian Private Trustees (Jersey) Limited and Ocorian Limited Re T Trust [2024] JRC 015 (18 January 2024)
The Distribution Plan cannot be blessed as presented due to unreasonable allocation of the French write off solely to C, failing to reflect joint venture reality with D. Trustees' approach to Property 1 is reasonable, giving D until end of February 2024 to provide proof of funds, failing which eviction proceedings and open market sale should proceed. Trustees' charging of W Trust administration costs to D is reasonable in principle, but quantum must be assessed. All costs incurred by Trustees and professional advisers since Settlor's death must be referred to Judicial Greffier Substitute for taxation on trustee basis due to substantial sums and credible challenges to quantum.
- Citation
- [2024] JRC 015
- Parties
- Applicant: The Trustees; Respondent: C; Respondent: D; Respondent: B; Respondent: E; Respondent: Advocate Renouf
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 18 January 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Trust Administration/blessing Application / Post Interim Judgment, Final Distribution Plan Approval
- Outcome
- Court refuses to bless the Distribution Plan as presented; approves Trustees' approach to Property 1 and charging of W Trust administration costs in principle; directs taxation of all costs incurred since Settlor's death.
- Legal Topics
- Trustee Decision Making, Distribution of Trust Assets, Allocation of Losses, Quantum and Allocation of Costs, Court Blessing of Trustee Actions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Trustees
Applicant
C
Respondent
D
Respondent
B
Respondent
E
Respondent
Advocate Renouf
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Trust Administration/blessing Application / Post Interim Judgment, Final Distribution Plan Approval
Legal Issues
- 1 Should the court bless the Distribution Plan for winding up the T Trusts and distributing assets?
- 2 How should the French write off be allocated among beneficiaries?
- 3 Is the Trustees' approach to Property 1 reasonable?
Ratio Decidendi
The Distribution Plan cannot be blessed as presented due to unreasonable allocation of the French write off solely to C, failing to reflect joint venture reality with D. Trustees' approach to Property 1 is reasonable, giving D until end of February 2024 to provide proof of funds, failing which eviction proceedings and open market sale should proceed. Trustees' charging of W Trust administration costs to D is reasonable in principle, but quantum must be assessed. All costs incurred by Trustees and professional advisers since Settlor's death must be referred to Judicial Greffier Substitute for taxation on trustee basis due to substantial sums and credible challenges to quantum.
Court Disposition
Court refuses to bless the Distribution Plan as presented; approves Trustees' approach to Property 1 and charging of W Trust administration costs in principle; directs taxation of all costs incurred since Settlor's death.
Orders
- Trustees to provide detailed costs budget for implementing steps plan, including eviction proceedings.
- All internal administration costs and professional fees/expenses since Settlor's death to be referred to Judicial Greffier Substitute for taxation on trustee basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment