L v V [2004] JRC 033 (19 February 2004)

L v V [2004] JRC 033 (19 February 2004)

The consent orders of 2002 and 2003 were set aside because there was no evidence that the Registrar applied judicial scrutiny to the fairness of the agreements, as required by law. The division of assets was then determined de novo, prioritizing the welfare of the children and fairness to both parties, resulting in a 60/40 split in favor of the wife.

Citation
[2004] JRC 033
Parties
Petitioner: the husband; Respondent: the wife
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
19 February 2004
Procedural Posture
Matrimonial/family Law / Application to Set Aside and Vary Consent Orders Following Divorce and Financial Settlement
Outcome
Consent orders of 2002 and 2003 set aside; new division of assets ordered; maintenance and school fee obligations clarified.
Legal Topics
Consent Orders, Variation of Orders, Financial Provision, Children's Welfare, Judicial Scrutiny of Agreements
Family Law Consent Orders Variation of Orders Financial Provision Children's Welfare Judicial Scrutiny of Agreements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

the husband

Petitioner

the wife

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Matrimonial/family Law / Application to Set Aside and Vary Consent Orders Following Divorce and Financial Settlement

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the consent orders of 2002 and 2003 should be set aside
  2. 2 Whether the financial arrangements between the parties should be varied
  3. 3 Proper division of family assets and maintenance obligations

Ratio Decidendi

The consent orders of 2002 and 2003 were set aside because there was no evidence that the Registrar applied judicial scrutiny to the fairness of the agreements, as required by law. The division of assets was then determined de novo, prioritizing the welfare of the children and fairness to both parties, resulting in a 60/40 split in favor of the wife.

Court Disposition

Consent orders of 2002 and 2003 set aside; new division of assets ordered; maintenance and school fee obligations clarified.

Orders

  • The net proceeds of sale (£258,493.24) plus advances (£50,000 each) to be divided 60% to the wife (£215,095.94) and 40% to the husband (£143,397.29), less advances already paid.
  • Wife to receive £210,630.94 (including other assets), husband to receive £74,692.29 (including other assets and liabilities).