Re D [2009] JRC 067A (09 April 2009)
The court exercised its discretion to grant leave for disclosure of the requested documents to police legal advisers, finding that the husband's right to defend himself in potential criminal proceedings outweighed the confidentiality concerns, provided that appropriate conditions were imposed to protect the interests of the children and the integrity of the family proceedings.
- Citation
- [2009] JRC 067A
- Parties
- Applicant: The wife; Respondent: The husband
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 09 April 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Disclosure Application / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Disclose Documents
- Outcome
- Application granted with conditions
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure of Documents, Confidentiality in Family Proceedings, Use of Family Court Documents in Criminal Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The wife
Applicant
The husband
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Disclosure Application / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Disclose Documents
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to disclose family court documents to police legal advisers for the purpose of a criminal investigation against the husband
- 2 What conditions, if any, should be imposed on such disclosure
Ratio Decidendi
The court exercised its discretion to grant leave for disclosure of the requested documents to police legal advisers, finding that the husband's right to defend himself in potential criminal proceedings outweighed the confidentiality concerns, provided that appropriate conditions were imposed to protect the interests of the children and the integrity of the family proceedings.
Court Disposition
Application granted with conditions
Orders
- Leave granted for disclosure of the requested documents to Mrs. O'Donnell and other police legal advisers solely for the purpose of determining whether to prosecute the husband.
- The name of the child who made a witness statement is not to be redacted; the name of the other sibling is to be redacted where it appears.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment