Jersey Judgment

Token Ltd. v P. E. C. [2001] JLR 698 (28 November 2001)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

A legitimate expectation arising from a Committee's prior representation may bind the Committee if it would be unfair to hold otherwise; courts must ensure consistency and fairness between individual and state when considering the merits of the Committee's decision.

Court disposition

judgment on legitimate expectation

02

Material facts

Parties

Token Ltd.

Applicant

P. E. C.

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Administrative Law / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicant relied on Committee's prior representation and claims legitimate expectation should bind the Committee.
Respondent
Respondent argues Committee is not bound by prior representation and decision was made on merits.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Jersey Law Reports [2001] JLR 698

    Legitimate expectation based on Committee's prior representation may be sufficient to bind Committee if unfair to hold otherwise.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

A legitimate expectation arising from a Committee's prior representation may bind the Committee if it would be unfair to hold otherwise; courts must ensure consistency and fairness between individual and state when considering the merits of the Committee's decision.

Obiter and limits

  • Courts should ensure consistency and fairness between individual and state on consideration of merits of Committee's decision.

Court disposition

judgment on legitimate expectation

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2001] JLR 698

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Token Ltd. v P. E. C. [2001] JLR 698 (28 November 2001) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2001/JLR010698.html Cite as: [2001] JLR 698 [ New search ] [ Help ] Token Ltd. v P. E. C. 2001 JLR 698 (28 November 2001) Administrative Law-Committees of States-legitimate expectation of applicant-legitimate expectation based on Committee's prior representation may be sufficient to bind Committee to representation if unfair to hold otherwise-courts to ensure consistency and fairness between individual and state on consideration of merits of Committee's decision The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2001 JLR 698 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2001/JLR010698.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

[2001] JLR 698

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.