Representation of Sterling Insurance Co Ltd [2015] JRC 263 (18 December 2015)
The Court is satisfied that all procedural requirements have been met, no objections have been received, the Independent Actuary confirms no material adverse effect on policyholders, and the Jersey Financial Services Commission has no objections; therefore, the Jersey Scheme is sanctioned.
- Citation
- [2015] JRC 263
- Parties
- First Representor: Sterling Insurance Company Limited; Second Representor: Covea Insurance plc
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Insurance Business Transfer Scheme / Application for Court Sanction
- Outcome
- Jersey Scheme sanctioned
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Insurance Business, Court Sanction of Schemes, Internal Corporate Reorganisation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sterling Insurance Company Limited
First Representor
Covea Insurance plc
Second Representor
Procedural Posture
Insurance Business Transfer Scheme / Application for Court Sanction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Jersey Scheme for transfer of general insurance business from Sterling to Covea should be sanctioned by the Court
- 2 Whether procedural requirements under the Insurance Business (Jersey) Law 1996 have been met
- 3 Whether the transfer adversely affects policyholders
Ratio Decidendi
The Court is satisfied that all procedural requirements have been met, no objections have been received, the Independent Actuary confirms no material adverse effect on policyholders, and the Jersey Financial Services Commission has no objections; therefore, the Jersey Scheme is sanctioned.
Court Disposition
Jersey Scheme sanctioned
Orders
- Order made in terms of the draft order supplied
- Transfer of general insurance business from Sterling to Covea to take effect simultaneously with UK Scheme
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment