Jersey Judgment

Trilogy v. YT Charitable Foundation [2015] 2 JLR 15 (12 August 2015)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Outgoing trustee directed by court to select successor acts as agent of the court and must disclose reasons for selection; further disclosure may be ordered if necessary and proportionate to enable evaluation of the decision.

Court disposition

Court ordered outgoing trustee to disclose reasons for selection of successor; further disclosure may be ordered if necessary and proportionate.

Orders

  • Outgoing trustee to disclose reasons for selection of successor trustee.
  • Court may order additional disclosure if necessary and proportionate.

02

Material facts

Parties

Trilogy

Applicant

YT Charitable Foundation

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Trusts / Appointment of Trustee

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Outgoing trustee should be required to disclose reasons for selection and possibly deliberations and legal advice to enable evaluation of decision.
Respondent
Outgoing trustee is not exercising trustee discretion but acting as agent of the court; disclosure should be limited to reasons for selection unless further disclosure is necessary and proportionate.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Jersey trust law

    Outgoing trustee directed by court to select successor is not exercising trustee discretion but acting as agent of the court.

  2. 02

    Jersey trust law

    Disclosure of reasons for selection is required; additional disclosure may be ordered if necessary and proportionate.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Outgoing trustee directed by court to select successor acts as agent of the court and must disclose reasons for selection; further disclosure may be ordered if necessary and proportionate to enable evaluation of the decision.

Obiter and limits

  • Additional disclosure such as deliberations and legal advice may be ordered if circumstances warrant.

Court disposition

Court ordered outgoing trustee to disclose reasons for selection of successor; further disclosure may be ordered if necessary and proportionate.

  • Outgoing trustee to disclose reasons for selection of successor trustee.
  • Court may order additional disclosure if necessary and proportionate.

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2015] 2 JLR 15

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Trilogy v. YT Charitable Foundation [2015] 2 JLR 15 (12 August 2015) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2015/JLR152015.html Cite as: [2015] 2 JLR 15 [ New search ] [ Help ] Trilogy v. YT Charitable Foundation 2015 (2) JLR 15 (12 August 2015) Trusts-appointment of trustees-selection of new trustee-outgoing trustee directed by court to select successor (to be appointed by court) not exercising trustee discretion but acting as agent of court-ordered to disclose reasons for selection-additional disclosure may be ordered (e.g. deliberations and legal advice) if necessary and proportionate to enable evaluation of decision The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2015 (2) JLR 15 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2015/JLR152015.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.