United Capital v Bender [2006] JLR 269 (14 July 2006)
The Court of Appeal's intervention is limited to specific circumstances where the Royal Court's exercise of discretion is flawed as outlined in the enumerated principles.
- Citation
- [2006] JLR 269
- Parties
- Appellant: United Capital; Respondent: Bender
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal
- Legal Topics
- Appeals, Exercise of Discretion, Appellate Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
United Capital
Appellant
Bender
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 When should the Court of Appeal interfere with the exercise of discretion by the Royal Court?
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal's intervention is limited to specific circumstances where the Royal Court's exercise of discretion is flawed as outlined in the enumerated principles.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment