Szulc -v- AG [2013] JRC 249 (09 December 2013)
The Relief Magistrate misdirected himself by disregarding the fiancée's long-term residence and Convention rights; the appellate court found that, while the appellant's conduct met the threshold for detriment, the balancing exercise required by law weighed in favour of setting aside the deportation recommendation due to the fiancée's rights and circumstances.
- Citation
- [2013] JRC 249
- Parties
- Appellant: Unknown (Appellant/Defendant); Respondent: Attorney General (Respondent)
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 09 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Deportation Recommendation
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Deportation, European Convention Rights, Driving Offences, Judicial Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Unknown (Appellant/Defendant)
Appellant
Attorney General (Respondent)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Deportation Recommendation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's continued presence in the Island is detrimental
- 2 Whether European Convention rights preclude a deportation recommendation
Ratio Decidendi
The Relief Magistrate misdirected himself by disregarding the fiancée's long-term residence and Convention rights; the appellate court found that, while the appellant's conduct met the threshold for detriment, the balancing exercise required by law weighed in favour of setting aside the deportation recommendation due to the fiancée's rights and circumstances.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Recommendation for deportation set aside
- Costs awarded to the defence
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment