Houze v Degano [2012] JCA 024 (27 January 2012)

Houze v Degano [2012] JCA 024 (27 January 2012)

The arbitrator adhered to the bespoke arbitration rules agreed by the parties, provided fair opportunity for submissions, and made a determination based on those submissions. There was no procedural mishap, unfairness, or breach of natural justice. The Royal Court's basis for removal was not supported; the arbitrator's decision was within the scope of reasonable discretion and did not amount to misconduct under Article 26(1).

Citation
[2012] JCA 024
Parties
Respondent: Houzé Construction Limited; Appellant: Unknown (Claimant, Sub-contractor)
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
27 January 2012
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed; arbitrator not removed.
Legal Topics
Removal of Arbitrator, Misconduct in Arbitration, Procedural Fairness, Extension of Time, Interpretation of 'misconduct'
Arbitration Civil Procedure Removal of Arbitrator Misconduct in Arbitration Procedural Fairness Extension of Time Interpretation of 'misconduct'

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Houzé Construction Limited

Respondent

Unknown (Claimant, Sub-contractor)

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the arbitrator's refusal to grant an extension of time amounted to misconduct under Article 26(1) of the Arbitration (Jersey) Law 1998
  2. 2 Proper construction of 'misconduct' in arbitration law
  3. 3 Whether procedural decisions justified removal of arbitrator

Ratio Decidendi

The arbitrator adhered to the bespoke arbitration rules agreed by the parties, provided fair opportunity for submissions, and made a determination based on those submissions. There was no procedural mishap, unfairness, or breach of natural justice. The Royal Court's basis for removal was not supported; the arbitrator's decision was within the scope of reasonable discretion and did not amount to misconduct under Article 26(1).

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; arbitrator not removed.

Orders

  • The arbitrator's removal order is set aside.
  • Arbitration proceedings to continue under the original arbitrator.