AG v Gyimah [2008] JRC 113 (14 July 2008)

AG v Gyimah [2008] JRC 113 (14 July 2008)

Defendant's role equated to courier, not organiser; starting point of 6 years reduced by one third for guilty plea and further mitigation, resulting in 3½ years imprisonment.

Citation
[2008] JRC 113
Parties
Defendant: Unknown Defendant; Prosecutor: Attorney General
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
14 July 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
convicted and sentenced
Legal Topics
Drug Importation, Sentencing, Mitigation
Criminal Law Drug Importation Sentencing Mitigation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Unknown Defendant

Defendant

Attorney General

Prosecutor

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 appropriate sentencing for importation of cannabis
  2. 2 extent of defendant's involvement
  3. 3 mitigation factors

Ratio Decidendi

Defendant's role equated to courier, not organiser; starting point of 6 years reduced by one third for guilty plea and further mitigation, resulting in 3½ years imprisonment.

Court Disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • Imprisonment for 3½ years
  • Forfeiture and destruction of drugs