AG -v- Milon [2016] JRC 159 (09 September 2016)
Custodial sentences are mandatory for alcohol-fuelled violent assaults and assaults involving a shod foot unless exceptional circumstances exist, which are absent in this case; mitigation justifies a reduction in sentence length but not a non-custodial outcome.
- Citation
- [2016] JRC 159
- Parties
- Defendant: Unknown (Defendant); Prosecutor: Attorney General (Crown)
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 09 September 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- convicted and sentenced
- Legal Topics
- Grave and Criminal Assault, Sentencing, Alcohol Related Violence, Exclusion Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Unknown (Defendant)
Defendant
Attorney General (Crown)
Prosecutor
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for two counts of grave and criminal assault
- 2 Consideration of aggravating and mitigating factors in sentencing
- 3 Imposition of exclusion order
Ratio Decidendi
Custodial sentences are mandatory for alcohol-fuelled violent assaults and assaults involving a shod foot unless exceptional circumstances exist, which are absent in this case; mitigation justifies a reduction in sentence length but not a non-custodial outcome.
Court Disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- 20 months' imprisonment for Count 1
- 4 months' imprisonment for Count 2, consecutive to Count 1
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment