AG v Noble [2004] JRC 153 (03 September 2004)

AG v Noble [2004] JRC 153 (03 September 2004)

The period of incarceration has had a rehabilitative effect, justifying probation under supervision as an exceptional measure.

Citation
[2004] JRC 153
Parties
Defendant: Unknown Defendant; Prosecutor: Attorney General
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
03 September 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
Order for 12 months' probation under supervision; forfeiture and destruction of drugs.
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Probation, Drug Offences

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Unknown Defendant

Defendant

Attorney General

Prosecutor

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

  1. 1 Whether incarceration and subsequent probation is appropriate for the defendant in a drug offence case

Ratio Decidendi

The period of incarceration has had a rehabilitative effect, justifying probation under supervision as an exceptional measure.

Court Disposition

Order for 12 months' probation under supervision; forfeiture and destruction of drugs.

Orders

  • 12 months' probation under supervision of Mr Walter Stuart in Glasgow
  • Forfeiture and destruction of drugs