In re Z Trust [2016] 1 JLR 132 (22 February 2016)
The court may declare an appointment of trustees invalid if the appointor breaches fiduciary duty or fails to consider relevant consequences, under the Trusts (Jersey) Law 1984 and its inherent jurisdiction.
- Citation
- [2016] 1 JLR 132
- Parties
- Applicant: Unknown (Z Trust parties); Respondent: Unknown (Z Trust parties)
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 22 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Trusts Appointment of Trustees / Judgment on Validity of Appointment of Trustees
- Outcome
- Appointment of trustees may be declared invalid or voidable in specified circumstances.
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Trustees, Fiduciary Duty, Validity of Trustee Appointment, Mistake in Exercise of Power, Failure to Consider Consequences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Unknown (Z Trust parties)
Applicant
Unknown (Z Trust parties)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Trusts Appointment of Trustees / Judgment on Validity of Appointment of Trustees
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appointment of trustees was valid under the Trusts (Jersey) Law 1984
- 2 Whether breach of fiduciary duty by appointor invalidates appointment
- 3 Whether appointment is voidable for mistake or failure to consider consequences
Ratio Decidendi
The court may declare an appointment of trustees invalid if the appointor breaches fiduciary duty or fails to consider relevant consequences, under the Trusts (Jersey) Law 1984 and its inherent jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Appointment of trustees may be declared invalid or voidable in specified circumstances.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment