De Figueiredo -v- Commonwealth of Australia [2010] JRC 198A (03 November 2010)

De Figueiredo -v- Commonwealth of Australia [2010] JRC 198A (03 November 2010)

There are substantial grounds for believing the appellant would fail to surrender to custody if allowed bail, especially after dismissal of his appeal, making the risk of absconding too great.

Citation
[2010] JRC 198A
Parties
Respondent: Attorney General; Appellant: Unnamed Appellant
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
03 November 2010
Procedural Posture
Extradition Appeal / Post Appeal Bail Determination
Outcome
bail refused; appellant remanded in custody
Legal Topics
Bail, Risk of Absconding, Extradition Procedure
Criminal Law Extradition Law Bail Risk of Absconding Extradition Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Attorney General

Respondent

Unnamed Appellant

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Extradition Appeal / Post Appeal Bail Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Should the appellant be allowed to remain on bail after dismissal of his extradition appeal?

Ratio Decidendi

There are substantial grounds for believing the appellant would fail to surrender to custody if allowed bail, especially after dismissal of his appeal, making the risk of absconding too great.

Court Disposition

bail refused; appellant remanded in custody

Orders

  • appellant to be remanded in custody