AG v Harrington [2004] JRC 106 (11 June 2004)

AG v Harrington [2004] JRC 106 (11 June 2004)

The defendant's violent response, though provoked by unsolicited sexual advances, warrants a prison sentence, but due to his unblemished record and extreme provocation, the sentence is suspended.

Citation
[2004] JRC 106
Parties
Defendant: Unnamed Defendant; Prosecutor: Crown Advocate
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
11 June 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
12 months' imprisonment suspended for 12 months
Legal Topics
Assault, Provocation, Sentencing, Suspended Sentence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Unnamed Defendant

Defendant

Crown Advocate

Prosecutor

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

  1. 1 Whether the defendant's violent response to unsolicited sexual advances warrants imprisonment
  2. 2 Appropriate sentence considering provocation and defendant's background

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant's violent response, though provoked by unsolicited sexual advances, warrants a prison sentence, but due to his unblemished record and extreme provocation, the sentence is suspended.

Court Disposition

12 months' imprisonment suspended for 12 months

Orders

  • Sentence of 12 months' imprisonment suspended for 12 months