AG -v- Bailey [2013] JRC 166 (23 August 2013)
Custodial sentence totaling two years is justified due to repeated dishonesty offences, limited mitigation, and the need for deterrence.
- Citation
- [2013] JRC 166
- Parties
- Defendant: Unnamed Defendant; Prosecution: The Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 23 August 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- convicted and sentenced
- Legal Topics
- Dishonesty Offences, Sentencing, Recidivism
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Unnamed Defendant
Defendant
The Crown
Prosecution
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for repeated dishonesty offences
- 2 Consideration of mitigation in sentencing
Ratio Decidendi
Custodial sentence totaling two years is justified due to repeated dishonesty offences, limited mitigation, and the need for deterrence.
Court Disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- 18 months' imprisonment on Count 1 (concurrent)
- 18 months' imprisonment on Count 2 (concurrent)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment