AG -v- Davies [2018] JRC 002 (05 January 2018)
The appropriate sentence for the defendant, considering the amount of cannabis and cash involved and substantial mitigation, is 18 months' imprisonment, reduced from the Crown's suggested starting point.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] JRC 002
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Crown; Defendant: Unnamed Defendant
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 05 January 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- convicted and sentenced
- Legal Topics
- Drug Offences, Sentencing, Mitigation, Forfeiture
Criminal Law Drug Offences Sentencing Mitigation Forfeiture
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Parties
The Crown
Prosecution
Unnamed Defendant
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 appropriate sentence for possession and dealing of cannabis resin
- 2 application of sentencing guidelines in drug trafficking cases
- 3 consideration of mitigation in sentencing
Ratio Decidendi
The appropriate sentence for the defendant, considering the amount of cannabis and cash involved and substantial mitigation, is 18 months' imprisonment, reduced from the Crown's suggested starting point.
Court Disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- 18 months' imprisonment on Count 1
- 18 months' imprisonment on Count 2
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment