AG -v- Keenan [2011] JRC 143 (22 July 2011)

AG -v- Keenan [2011] JRC 143 (22 July 2011)

The defendant committed both planning and housing law offences, with the planning offences being more serious due to lack of permission and creation of a fire hazard. The housing law offences were serious except for one technical offence. Sentencing must reflect the seriousness, the totality principle, and the defendant's ability to pay, with mitigation for a guilty plea and stress from delay.

Citation
[2011] JRC 143
Parties
Prosecutor: Attorney General; Defendant: Unnamed Defendant
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
22 July 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
convicted and fined
Legal Topics
Planning Offences, Housing Offences, Sentencing, Mitigation, Illicit Profit, Totality Principle
Criminal Law Planning Law Housing Law Planning Offences Housing Offences Sentencing Mitigation Illicit Profit +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Attorney General

Prosecutor

Unnamed Defendant

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant committed offences under planning and housing law
  2. 2 Appropriate sentencing for planning and housing law offences
  3. 3 Consideration of mitigation and ability to pay

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant committed both planning and housing law offences, with the planning offences being more serious due to lack of permission and creation of a fire hazard. The housing law offences were serious except for one technical offence. Sentencing must reflect the seriousness, the totality principle, and the defendant's ability to pay, with mitigation for a guilty plea and stress from delay.

Court Disposition

convicted and fined

Orders

  • Fined £1,500 each on Counts 1 and 2 (housing law), with one month's imprisonment in default, to run consecutively (£3,000 total)
  • Fined £100 on Count 3 (housing law), with one week's imprisonment in default, to run concurrently