Vezier v Bellego [1994] JLR 75 (15 February 1994)
Where two actions are erroneously brought by different parties under the Fatal Accidents (Jersey) Law 1962, the court may add the parties of one action to the other and withdraw the second action; such actions are not void per se under the Royal Court Rules 1992.
- Citation
- [1994] JLR 75
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Vezier; Defendant: Bellego
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 15 February 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Tort Fatal Accidents / Interlocutory Application Regarding Multiple Actions
- Outcome
- Actions may be consolidated; second action to be withdrawn after addition of parties.
- Legal Topics
- Fatal Accidents, Multiplicity of Actions, Procedural Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vezier
Plaintiff
Bellego
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Tort Fatal Accidents / Interlocutory Application Regarding Multiple Actions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether more than one action may be brought under the Fatal Accidents (Jersey) Law 1962 following a death
- 2 Whether actions brought by different parties are void ab initio or may be consolidated
Ratio Decidendi
Where two actions are erroneously brought by different parties under the Fatal Accidents (Jersey) Law 1962, the court may add the parties of one action to the other and withdraw the second action; such actions are not void per se under the Royal Court Rules 1992.
Court Disposition
Actions may be consolidated; second action to be withdrawn after addition of parties.
Orders
- Add parties of one action to the other
- Withdraw the second action
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment