1998/86 - AG v Vieira [1998] UR 86 (24 April 1998)

1998/86 - AG v Vieira [1998] UR 86 (24 April 1998)

Probation is not effective for Vieira due to repeated breaches and multiple drug offences; imprisonment is warranted for deterrence and protection of the public.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1998] UR 86
Parties
Defendant: Vieira; Prosecutor: Attorney General; Defence Advocate: Mrs Deacon
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
24 April 1998
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
convicted and sentenced
Legal Topics
Drug Offences, Probation Breach, Sentencing
Criminal Law Drug Offences Probation Breach Sentencing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vieira

Defendant

Attorney General

Prosecutor

Mrs Deacon

Defence Advocate

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

  1. 1 sentencing for possession of heroin
  2. 2 breach of probation order

Ratio Decidendi

Probation is not effective for Vieira due to repeated breaches and multiple drug offences; imprisonment is warranted for deterrence and protection of the public.

Court Disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • one month imprisonment on count 1
  • six months imprisonment on count 2, concurrent