Representation of Virtue Trustees (Switzerland) AG and Anor re The C Trust [2018] JRC 100 (11 June 2018)
The Trust Instrument did not reflect the settlor's true intention, as A did not intend to exclude D, B, C, E, or their issue from benefit. The inclusion of D as protector was a genuine mistake. The Court is satisfied on the evidence that rectification is appropriate to give effect to A's intentions. The rectification is to be made as sought by the Representors. Blessing of past distributions is unnecessary as rectification is deemed to date from the creation of the Trust.
- Citation
- [2018] JRC 100
- Parties
- Applicant: Virtue Trustees (Switzerland) AG; Applicant: Vantage Capital Management AG; Respondent: B; Respondent: C; Respondent: E; Interested Party: Her Majesty's Attorney General; Guardian Ad Litem for B and C Minors: Advocate Damian Evans; Guardian Ad Litem for E Minors: Advocate Craig Swart
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 11 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Representation (trusts) / Judgment on Application for Rectification and Blessing
- Outcome
- Application granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Trusts, Excluded Persons, Trustee Powers, Beneficiaries, Letters of Wishes, Capacity of Settlor
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Virtue Trustees (Switzerland) AG
Applicant
Vantage Capital Management AG
Applicant
B
Respondent
C
Respondent
E
Respondent
Her Majesty's Attorney General
Interested Party
Advocate Damian Evans
Guardian Ad Litem for B and C Minors
Advocate Craig Swart
Guardian Ad Litem for E Minors
Procedural Posture
Representation (trusts) / Judgment on Application for Rectification and Blessing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Trust Instrument should be rectified to reflect the settlor's true intention regarding excluded persons and beneficiaries
- 2 Whether the Court should bless past distributions made by the trustees
- 3 Whether the appointment of D as protector inadvertently excluded intended beneficiaries
Ratio Decidendi
The Trust Instrument did not reflect the settlor's true intention, as A did not intend to exclude D, B, C, E, or their issue from benefit. The inclusion of D as protector was a genuine mistake. The Court is satisfied on the evidence that rectification is appropriate to give effect to A's intentions. The rectification is to be made as sought by the Representors. Blessing of past distributions is unnecessary as rectification is deemed to date from the creation of the Trust.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part
Orders
- The Trust Instrument is rectified as sought in paragraph 1 of the Representation dated 23 November 2017.
- No order made on blessing past distributions, as rectification is deemed to date from the creation of the Trust.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment