Representation of Viscount [2008] JRC 212 (10 December 2008)
The confiscation order has not yet been satisfied; Article 20 requires payments as directed by the court, then Viscount's fees and expenses, then application of balance to the confiscation order. The court directs the prison authorities to treat the defendant as serving a 6-year sentence until 7 January 2009 or earlier satisfaction of the order.
- Citation
- [2008] JRC 212
- Parties
- Applicant: Viscount; Defendant: Peter Michel; Respondent: Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Representation / Post Conviction Directions
- Outcome
- Directions issued; extension of time for payment granted.
- Legal Topics
- Money Laundering, Confiscation Orders, Costs, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Viscount
Applicant
Peter Michel
Defendant
Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Representation / Post Conviction Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Has the defendant complied with the confiscation order?
- 2 Interpretation of Article 20 of the Proceeds of Crime (Jersey) Law 1999 regarding payment priorities.
Ratio Decidendi
The confiscation order has not yet been satisfied; Article 20 requires payments as directed by the court, then Viscount's fees and expenses, then application of balance to the confiscation order. The court directs the prison authorities to treat the defendant as serving a 6-year sentence until 7 January 2009 or earlier satisfaction of the order.
Court Disposition
Directions issued; extension of time for payment granted.
Orders
- The Viscount is empowered to realise sufficient cash from property vested in him to pay the costs order (£1,665,598) and the confiscation order (£9,730,152).
- Payments to be made within 21 days in the specified order: (i) £1,665,598 to nominated account for costs, (ii) £9,730,152 (less Viscount's fees and expenses) to Criminal Offences Confiscation Fund.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment