U v W (Matrimonial) (Royal Court : Hearing (Civil) : Daultrey : Matrimonial) [2025] JRC 281 (4 November 2025)
Fraud and procedural irregularity occurred as the respondent was not served and her signature was forged; the fraud did not affect jurisdiction, rendering the decrees voidable. Both parties agree to rescission, and the court exercises discretion to set aside the decrees.
- Citation
- [2025] JRC 281
- Parties
- Petitioner: U; Respondent: W
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 04 November 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Petition / Application to Rescind Decree Nisi and Decree Absolute
- Outcome
- Decree nisi and decree absolute set aside; respondent's application granted.
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Fraudulent Service, Setting Aside Decrees, Procedural Irregularity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
U
Petitioner
W
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Petition / Application to Rescind Decree Nisi and Decree Absolute
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether divorce decrees should be set aside due to fraud and lack of service
- 2 Whether the decrees are void or voidable
- 3 Entitlement to costs and referral to Attorney General
Ratio Decidendi
Fraud and procedural irregularity occurred as the respondent was not served and her signature was forged; the fraud did not affect jurisdiction, rendering the decrees voidable. Both parties agree to rescission, and the court exercises discretion to set aside the decrees.
Court Disposition
Decree nisi and decree absolute set aside; respondent's application granted.
Orders
- Petitioner to pay respondent's costs on an indemnity basis.
- No referral to Attorney General.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment