W v. Jersey Fin. Servs. Commn. [2015] 1 JLR 71 (15 December 2014)
A temporary stay of the appeal against the Commission's decision to make a public statement was justified because there was a significant overlap between the proposed statement alleging a serious lack of integrity and the possible prosecution for dishonesty, creating a real risk of serious prejudice to the applicant.
- Citation
- [2015] 1 JLR 71
- Parties
- Applicant: W; Respondent: Jersey Financial Services Commission
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Stay of Proceedings / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Temporary stay granted
- Legal Topics
- Public Statements by Regulators, Stay of Proceedings, Prejudice to Criminal Investigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
W
Applicant
Jersey Financial Services Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Stay of Proceedings / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a temporary stay of appeal against the Commission's decision to make a public statement should be granted pending a criminal investigation into the same matter
- 2 Whether there is a real risk of serious prejudice to the applicant if the public statement is made while a criminal investigation is ongoing
Ratio Decidendi
A temporary stay of the appeal against the Commission's decision to make a public statement was justified because there was a significant overlap between the proposed statement alleging a serious lack of integrity and the possible prosecution for dishonesty, creating a real risk of serious prejudice to the applicant.
Court Disposition
Temporary stay granted
Orders
- Temporary stay of appeal against the Commission's decision to make a public statement pending the outcome of the criminal investigation
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment