W v X (Family) 16-Nov-2020 [2020] JRC 240 (15 November 2020)

W v X (Family) 16-Nov-2020 [2020] JRC 240 (15 November 2020)

The Registrar's order for periodical payments was not procedurally irregular, was based on relevant findings, and was affordable for the Father given his borrowing capacity and lifestyle. The appeal failed as the Registrar exercised discretion properly and did not reach a wrong conclusion.

Citation
[2020] JRC 240
Parties
Appellant: W; Respondent: X
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
15 November 2020
Procedural Posture
Family Law Appeal / Appeal From Registrar's Order
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Periodical Payments, Financial Provision for Child, Variation of Maintenance Order, Procedural Irregularity
Family Law Child Maintenance Periodical Payments Financial Provision for Child Variation of Maintenance Order Procedural Irregularity

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 22
Sign in to unlock

Parties

W

Appellant

X

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family Law Appeal / Appeal From Registrar's Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Registrar's maintenance order was affordable for the Father
  2. 2 Whether procedural irregularities affected the fairness of the hearing
  3. 3 Whether the Registrar ignored relevant matters or took into account irrelevant matters

Ratio Decidendi

The Registrar's order for periodical payments was not procedurally irregular, was based on relevant findings, and was affordable for the Father given his borrowing capacity and lifestyle. The appeal failed as the Registrar exercised discretion properly and did not reach a wrong conclusion.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Registrar's order for periodical payments upheld
  • Application to vary the order dismissed