Jersey Judgment

Wadman v Dick [1993] JLR 52 (22 April 1993)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Letters of Request from a foreign court can be amended by excision, addition, or substitution of words under Jersey law, provided the substance is not altered.

Court disposition

request partially granted

Orders

  • Letters of Request to be amended as permitted under Service of Process and Taking of Evidence (Jersey) Law 1960, art. 4

02

Material facts

Parties

Wadman

Applicant

Dick

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Application for Assistance to Foreign Court / Ruling on Letters of Request

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicant sought effect to be given to Letters of Request from a foreign court for examination of witnesses under Jersey law.
Respondent
Respondent objected to the scope of the request, arguing it was too widely framed.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Service of Process and Taking of Evidence (Jersey) Law 1960, art. 4, as amended

    Letters of Request from a foreign court may be given effect in Jersey so far as proper, permissible, or practicable under Jersey law.

  2. 02

    Service of Process and Taking of Evidence (Jersey) Law 1960, art. 4, as amended

    A request too widely framed may be amended by excision, addition, or substitution of words, provided the substance is not altered.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Letters of Request from a foreign court can be amended by excision, addition, or substitution of words under Jersey law, provided the substance is not altered.

Court disposition

request partially granted

  • Letters of Request to be amended as permitted under Service of Process and Taking of Evidence (Jersey) Law 1960, art. 4

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[1993] JLR 52

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Wadman v Dick [1993] JLR 52 (22 April 1993) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1993/JLR930052.html Cite as: [1993] JLR 52 [ New search ] [ Help ] Wadman v Dick 1993 JLR 52 (22 April 1993) Evidence - assistance to foreign court - examination of witnesses - effect to be given to Letters of Request from foreign court in so far as proper, permissible or practicable under Jersey Law-request too widely framed may be amended by excision, addition or substitution of words under Service of Process and Taking of Evidence (Jersey) Law 1960, art. 4, as amended, provided substance not altered The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 1993 JLR 52 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1993/JLR930052.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Service of Process and Taking of Evidence (Jersey) Law 1960, art. 4

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.