Walters v Bingham [1985] JLR 439 (22 December 1986)
An interlocutory injunction may be lifted if the original application involved material misrepresentation or non-disclosure that would have affected the grant of the injunction; however, failure to provide an affidavit is not material non-disclosure except in specific cases such as Mareva injunctions.
- Citation
- [1985] JLR 439
- Parties
- Applicant: Walters; Respondent: Bingham
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 22 December 1986
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- clarification of principles; outcome on facts not provided
- Legal Topics
- Injunctions, Misrepresentation, Non Disclosure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Walters
Applicant
Bingham
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an interlocutory injunction should be lifted due to material misrepresentation or non-disclosure by the applicant
- 2 Whether failure to provide an affidavit is material non-disclosure
Ratio Decidendi
An interlocutory injunction may be lifted if the original application involved material misrepresentation or non-disclosure that would have affected the grant of the injunction; however, failure to provide an affidavit is not material non-disclosure except in specific cases such as Mareva injunctions.
Court Disposition
clarification of principles; outcome on facts not provided
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment