Walters v Bingham [1985] JLR 439 (22 December 1986)

Walters v Bingham [1985] JLR 439 (22 December 1986)

An interlocutory injunction may be lifted if the original application involved material misrepresentation or non-disclosure that would have affected the grant of the injunction; however, failure to provide an affidavit is not material non-disclosure except in specific cases such as Mareva injunctions.

Citation
[1985] JLR 439
Parties
Applicant: Walters; Respondent: Bingham
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
22 December 1986
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory
Outcome
clarification of principles; outcome on facts not provided
Legal Topics
Injunctions, Misrepresentation, Non Disclosure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Walters

Applicant

Bingham

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interlocutory

  1. 1 Whether an interlocutory injunction should be lifted due to material misrepresentation or non-disclosure by the applicant
  2. 2 Whether failure to provide an affidavit is material non-disclosure

Ratio Decidendi

An interlocutory injunction may be lifted if the original application involved material misrepresentation or non-disclosure that would have affected the grant of the injunction; however, failure to provide an affidavit is not material non-disclosure except in specific cases such as Mareva injunctions.

Court Disposition

clarification of principles; outcome on facts not provided