Jersey Judgment

Warder, Whitworth, Harris, Byrne, Aubert, Gill and Hedges -v- George Troy & Sons Limited [1996] JRC 206 (04 November 1996)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Material facts

Parties

Warder

Plaintiff

Whitworth

Plaintiff

Harris

Plaintiff

Byrne

Plaintiff

Aubert

Plaintiff

Gill

Plaintiff

Hedges

Plaintiff

George Troy & Sons Limited

Defendant

02

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil / Judgment

03

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether George Troy & Sons Limited owed contractual remuneration to the plaintiffs

04

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Common law

    Contractual obligations regarding remuneration must be honoured unless validly discharged or varied.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[1996] JRC 206

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Unreported Judgments You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Unreported Judgments >> Warder, Whitworth, Harris, Byrne, Aubert, Gill and Hedges -v- George Troy & Sons Limited [1996] JRC 206 (04 November 1996) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/UR/1996/1996_206.html Cite as: [1996] JRC 206 [ New search ] [ Printable PDF version ] [ Help ] Warder, Whitworth, Harris, Byrne, Aubert, Gill and Hedges -v- George Troy & Sons Limited [1996] JRC 206 (04 November 1996) A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [1996] JRC 206 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/UR/1996/1996_206.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.