C.D. Osmand v Wessex Roof (Jersey) [1991] JLR_Note 6c (24 January 1991)
The court considered the terms that are customarily implied into construction contracts concerning the duties of contractors.
- Parties
- Claimant: C. D. Osmand; Defendant: Wessex Roof (Jersey)
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 24 January 1991
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Legal Topics
- Implied Terms, Contractor's Duties, Construction Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
C. D. Osmand
Claimant
Wessex Roof (Jersey)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 What terms are customarily implied into construction contracts regarding contractor's duties?
Ratio Decidendi
The court considered the terms that are customarily implied into construction contracts concerning the duties of contractors.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment