Whiteside v Kerrell [1990] JLR_Note 11a (24 October 1990)
The court held that security for costs can be ordered against third parties in certain situations.
- Parties
- Applicant: Whiteside; Respondent: Kerrell
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 1990
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- interlocutory order
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Third Parties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
Whiteside
Applicant
Kerrell
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether security for costs can be ordered against third parties
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that security for costs can be ordered against third parties in certain situations.
Court Disposition
interlocutory order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment