AG v Withe [2023] JRC 123 (19 July 2023)
Where the factual basis of the jury's verdict is open to more than one interpretation, the judge must sentence on the basis of the prosecution's evidence as accepted by the jury, except where not sure, in which case the most favourable interpretation to the defendant must be adopted. In this case, the defendant is to be sentenced on the Crown's case, excluding reference to the knife.
- Citation
- [2023] JRC 123
- Parties
- Prosecution: Attorney General; Defendant: Williams; Victim: Complainant
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Post Conviction, Sentencing
- Outcome
- Defendant to be sentenced on the Crown's case, excluding reference to the knife.
- Legal Topics
- Common Assault, Grave and Criminal Assault, Domestic Violence, Sentencing Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Prosecution
Williams
Defendant
Complainant
Victim
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Post Conviction, Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 On what factual basis should the defendant be sentenced following a conviction for common assault where facts are disputed under Article 50 of the Criminal Procedure (Jersey) Law 2018?
- 2 Does the presence of a knife or the nature of the assault elevate the offence to grave and criminal assault?
Ratio Decidendi
Where the factual basis of the jury's verdict is open to more than one interpretation, the judge must sentence on the basis of the prosecution's evidence as accepted by the jury, except where not sure, in which case the most favourable interpretation to the defendant must be adopted. In this case, the defendant is to be sentenced on the Crown's case, excluding reference to the knife.
Court Disposition
Defendant to be sentenced on the Crown's case, excluding reference to the knife.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment