Jersey Judgment

Young v Att. Gen. [1999] JLR 17 (22 January 1999)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court held that art. 12(c) does not require proof that the accused intended the false statement to act as an inducement; the statutory language specifies the required mental element and does not imply an additional requirement.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

02

Material facts

Parties

Young

Applicant

Attorney General

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Appeal / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant argued that the offence under art. 12(c) requires proof that the accused intended the false statement to act as an inducement to investors.
Respondent
The respondent argued that no such additional mental element is required beyond what is specified in the statute.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Investors (Prevention of Fraud) (Jersey) Law 1967, art. 12(c)

    No requirement that the accused intended the false statement to act as an inducement under art. 12(c); the statutory offence specifies the necessary intention.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court held that art. 12(c) does not require proof that the accused intended the false statement to act as an inducement; the statutory language specifies the required mental element and does not imply an additional requirement.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[1999] JLR 17

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Young v Att. Gen. [1999] JLR 17 (22 January 1999) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1999/JLR990017.html Cite as: [1999] JLR 17 [ New search ] [ Help ] Young v Att. Gen. 1999 JLR 17 (22 January 1999) Financial Services - investor protection - fraudulent inducement to investors - elements of offence-fraudulent inducement to take part in arrangement with respect to property-elements of offence under Investors (Prevention of Fraud) (Jersey) Law 1967, art. 12(c)-no requirement that accused intended false statement to act as inducement-additional mental element not implied in statutory offence already specifying intention required The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 1999 JLR 17 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1999/JLR990017.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Investors (Prevention of Fraud) (Jersey) Law 1967, art. 12(c)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.