Young v Att. Gen. [1999] JLR 17 (22 January 1999)
- Citation
- [1999] JLR 17
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
More details
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court held that art. 12(c) does not require proof that the accused intended the false statement to act as an inducement; the statutory language specifies the required mental element and does not imply an additional requirement.
Court disposition
appeal dismissed
02
Material facts
Parties
Young
ApplicantAttorney General
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the offence under Investors (Prevention of Fraud) (Jersey) Law 1967, art. 12(c) requires that the accused intended the false statement to act as an inducement
- 02
Whether an additional mental element is implied in the statutory offence
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicant argued that the offence under art. 12(c) requires proof that the accused intended the false statement to act as an inducement to investors.
- Respondent
- The respondent argued that no such additional mental element is required beyond what is specified in the statute.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Investors (Prevention of Fraud) (Jersey) Law 1967, art. 12(c)
No requirement that the accused intended the false statement to act as an inducement under art. 12(c); the statutory offence specifies the necessary intention.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court held that art. 12(c) does not require proof that the accused intended the false statement to act as an inducement; the statutory language specifies the required mental element and does not imply an additional requirement.
Court disposition
appeal dismissed
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [
DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:
BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Young v Att. Gen. [1999] JLR 17 (22 January 1999) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1999/JLR990017.html Cite as: [1999] JLR 17 [ New search ] [ Help ] Young v Att. Gen. 1999 JLR 17 (22 January 1999) Financial Services - investor protection - fraudulent inducement to investors - elements of offence-fraudulent inducement to take part in arrangement with respect to property-elements of offence under Investors (Prevention of Fraud) (Jersey) Law 1967, art. 12(c)-no requirement that accused intended false statement to act as inducement-additional mental element not implied in statutory offence already specifying intention required The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 1999 JLR 17 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1999/JLR990017.html
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.