[2013] KECA 160 (KLR)

[2013] KECA 160 (KLR)

The Court found that the respondents did not participate in the High Court proceedings and the ruling was only against the applicant. Furthermore, the ruling does not affect or prejudice the respondents. Therefore, the Court exercised its discretion under Rule 77 of the Court of Appeal Rules to grant leave to the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KECA 160 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: 0903658 B.C. Limited previously known as Centric Energy Corporation; Respondent: National Oil Corporation of Kenya; Respondent: Platform Resources Inc; Respondent: Alec Edward Robinson; Respondent: Sumayya Athmani [MD NOCK]; Respondent: China National Offshore Oil Corporation
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 75 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Leave to Dispense With Service of Documents
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
A Mohammed
Legal Topics
Service of Documents, Leave of Court, Ex Parte Applications
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Service of Documents Leave of Court Ex Parte Applications

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

0903658 B.C. Limited previously known as Centric Energy Corporation

Applicant

National Oil Corporation of Kenya

Respondent

Platform Resources Inc

Respondent

Alec Edward Robinson

Respondent

Sumayya Athmani [MD NOCK]

Respondent

China National Offshore Oil Corporation

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Leave to Dispense With Service of Documents

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to dispense with service of documents in the appeal upon the respondents.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents are affected or prejudiced by the ruling of the High Court.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the respondents did not participate in the High Court proceedings and the ruling was only against the applicant. Furthermore, the ruling does not affect or prejudice the respondents. Therefore, the Court exercised its discretion under Rule 77 of the Court of Appeal Rules to grant leave to the applicant to dispense with service of documents in the appeal upon the respondents.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Leave is granted to dispense with service of documents in the appeal upon the respondents.
  • Costs shall be in the appeal.