https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/12111
The Court found that the Applicants had demonstrated eligibility, stability, moral fitness, and capacity to care for the child; the child was abandoned, declared free for adoption, and positively bonded with the Applicants. Applying the paramountcy of the child’s best interests, the Court held that adoption was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] KEHC 12111 (KLR)
- Parties
- 1st Applicant: TKK; 2nd Applicant: CS; Minor / Child: Baby SD
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause E052 of 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment on Originating Summons for Adoption
- Outcome
- Originating Summons allowed; adoption granted.
- Judges
- ["CJ Kendagor"]
- Legal Topics
- Adoption of a Minor, Best Interests of the Child, Consent and Suitability of Adoptive Parents, Presumption of Citizenship for a Foundling, Appointment of Legal Guardians, Registration of Adopted Child
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TKK
1st Applicant
CS
2nd Applicant
Baby SD
Minor / Child
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment on Originating Summons for Adoption
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Applicants were suitable and eligible to adopt the minor.
- 2 Whether the adoption served the best interests of the child.
- 3 Whether the child was free for adoption and properly identified as an abandoned child.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the Applicants had demonstrated eligibility, stability, moral fitness, and capacity to care for the child; the child was abandoned, declared free for adoption, and positively bonded with the Applicants. Applying the paramountcy of the child’s best interests, the Court held that adoption was warranted and issued the consequential guardianship, citizenship, and registration orders.
Court Disposition
Originating Summons allowed; adoption granted.
Orders
- TKK and CS are authorized to adopt Baby SD.
- Upon adoption, the child shall be known as TBC.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
In re SD (Minor) (Adoption Cause E052 of 2026) [2026] KEHC 12111 (KLR) (Family) (23 July 2026) (Judgment) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 12111 (KLR) Republic of Kenya In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts) Family Adoption Cause E052 of 2026 CJ Kendagor, J July 23, 2026 IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT, 2022 AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR ADOPTION OF SD, A MINOR In the matter of TKK 1st Applicant CS 2nd Applicant Judgment 1.Before this Court is the application dated 17th March, 2026. The Applicants, TKK and CS, seek to be authorised to adopt Baby SD, hereinafter referred to as (“the Child”), and, upon adoption, the Child is to be known as TBC. LKS and JMM are to be appointed as the Child’s legal guardians upon the granting of the adoption orders. 2.The Applicants are Kenyan citizens, as evidenced by their National Identity Cards. They are married, as evidenced by their marriage certificate. They are in good health, as per the medical reports, and have no criminal records. 3.The female Applicant is a trained teacher who has completed her Master’s Degree and is awaiting placement, while the male Applicant is a civil servant. The report from the Ministry of Gender, Culture and Children’s Services (Nairobi County), dated 11th June, 2026, indicates that the Applicants have a stable income from their employment and farming business, which is sufficient to meet the Child’s material needs. 4.The Applicants have one biological daughter, TJK, aged 12 years from whom consent was sought and granted through her letter dated 27th December, 2024. 5.The family has undergone background checks, and reports from the Ministry of Gender, Culture and Children’s Services and the appointed Guardian ad Litem (LJ) indicate they are eligible to adopt. They have indicated that they would like to legalize their relationship through adoption to enable the Child to become a complete member of the family. 6.The report from the Ministry of Gender, Culture and Children’s Services (Nairobi County) dated 11th June 2026 indicates that the adoption is a joint application by a Kenyan couple. The Child was found abandoned at Kitengela town on 9th October, 2024. The police letters dated 11th October, 2024 and 23rd April, 2025 state that the search for the Child’s parents has been fruitless and no one has come forward to claim the Child. The Child was declared free for adoption vide Certificate serial number 0xx1 dated 2nd May 2025 by the Kenya Children’s Homes Adoption Society. 7.Pending hearing of the application before this Court, LJ was appointed as Guardian ad Litem of the Child. She gave a positive report averring that the Child was in good health, happy, well cared for and has bonded well with the prospective parents. The report further states that Applicant was a good family fit for the Child. 8.LKS and JMM, the proposed legal guardians, are both Kenyan citizens as evidenced by their National Identity Cards. 9.The Child is presumed to be a Kenyan citizen by virtue of Article 14 (4) of the Constitution, having been found in Kenya and with his parents unknown at the time of his rescue. 10.In light of the best interests of the Child principle provided for under Article 53 (2) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010. Sections 8 (1), (2) and (3) of the Children’s Act No. 29 of 2022 and the 1st Schedule of the Children’s Act No. 29 of 2022, this Court has an obligation to prioritize the Child’s best interests in making decisions touching on him.a.Article 53 of the Constitution, 2010 states that a Child’s best interests are of paramount importance in every matter concerning the Child.b.Sections 8 (1), (2) and (3) of the Children’s Act No. 29 of 2022 provides as follows;(1)In all actions concerning Children, whether undertaken by public of private social welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies:(a)The best interests of the Child shall be the primary consideration;(b)The best interests of the Child shall include, but shall not be limited to the considerations set out in the First Schedule.(2)All judicial and administrative institutions, and all persons acting in the name of such institutions, when exercising any powers conferred under this Act or any other written law, shall treat the interests of the Child as the first and paramount consideration to the extent that this is consistent with adopting a course of action calculated to:-(a)safeguard and promote the rights and welfare of the Child;(b)conserve and promote the welfare of the Child; and(c)secure for the Child such guidance and correction as is necessary for the welfare of the Child, and in public interest.(3)In any matters affecting a Child, the Child shall be accorded an opportunity to express their opinion, and that opinion shall be taken into account in appropriate cases, having regard to the Child’s age and degree of maturity.c.The First Schedule as provided for under Section 8 (1) of the Children’s Act No. 29 of 2022 provides best interests considerations to be as follows:(1)The age, maturity, stage of development, gender, background and any other relevant characteristics of the Child.(2)Distinct special needs (if any) arising from chronic ailment or disability.(3)The relationship of the Child with the Child’s parent(s) and/or guardian(s) and any other persons who may significantly affect the Child’s welfare.(4)The preference of the Child, if old enough to express a meaningful preference.(5)The duration and adequacy of the Child’s current living arrangements and the desirability of maintaining continuity.(6)The stability of any proposed living arrangements for the Child.(7)The motivation of the parties involved and their capacities to give the Child love, affection and guidance.(8)The Child’s adjustment to the Child’s present home, school and community.(9)The capacity of each parent or guardian to allow and encourage frequent and continuing contact between the Child and the other parent and/or guardian(s), including physical access.(10)The capacity of each parent and/or guardian(s) to cooperate or to learn to cooperate in Child care.(11)Methods for assisting parental and/or guardian cooperation and resolving disputes and each parent’s/guardian’s willingness to use those methods.(12)The effect of the Child if one parent/guardian has sole authority over the Child’s upbringing.(13)The existence of domestic abuse between the parents/guardian (s), in the past or currently, and how that abuse affects the emotional stability and physical safety of the Child.(14)The existence of any history of Child abuse by a parent and/or guardian(s); or anyone residing in the same dwelling as the Child.(15)Where the Child is under one year of age, whether the Child is being breast - fed.(16)The existence of a parent’s(s) or guardian’s(s) conviction for a sex offense or a sexually violent offense under the Sexual Offences Act.(17)Where there is a person residing with a parent or guardian, whether that person; -(a)Has been convicted of a crime under this Act, the Sexual Offences Act, the Penal Code or any other legislation.(b)Has been adjudicated of a juvenile offence which, if the person had been an adult at the time of the offence, the person would have been convicted of a felony.(18)Any other factor which may have a direct or indirect effect on the physical and psychological well -being of the Child. 11.The report from the Ministry of Gender, Culture and Children’s Services (Nairobi County), the guardian ad litem, and the proposed legal guardians all indicate that the Child will be well taken care of in the care and custody of the adoptive parents. The Child attended a later hearing session and seems to have formed a strong bond with the adoptive parents. 12.The Applicants have been found suitable to adopt the Child herein; they have demonstrated commitment to the overall well-being, including provision of basic needs and love. I am convinced that this adoption offers the Child an opportunity for an improved quality of life. 13.In the circumstances, I allow the Originating Summons dated 17th March, 2026 and make the following orders:(a)The Applicants, TKK and CS, are authorized to adopt the Child known as Baby SD;(b)Upon adoption, the Child shall be known as TBC;(c)LKS and JMM are appointed as the legal guardians of the Child.(d)The Child is presumed to be a Kenyan Citizen by birth;(e)The Registrar General is directed to make the relevant entries in the Adopted Children’s Register in respect of the Child;(f)The Registrar of Births and Deaths is directed to issue a birth certificate in the Child’s new name;(g)The guardian ad litem is hereby discharged. 14.It is so ordered. DATED, DELIVERED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI ON THIS 23RD DAY OF JULY 2026.………………………C. KENDAGORJUDGEIn the presence of:Court Assistant: BerylMr. Oduor, Advocate for the Applicants