https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/5946

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/5946

The application was declined because the issue of enlargement of time to note the debenture had already been considered and determined by the court in orders made on 23 December 2025; the present motion was therefore unnecessary and redundant.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 5946 (KLR)
Parties
1st Applicant: M Oriental Bank Limited; 2nd Applicant: Kailash Concrete Enterprises Limited
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Miscellaneous 414 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Civil Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Notice of Motion
Outcome
Application effectively dismissed/declined as already determined.
Judges
["RN Nyakundi"]
Legal Topics
Enlargement of Time, Noting of Charge/debenture, Ex Parte Application, Duplicate Application, Companies Registry Filing
Source Language
en
Company Law Civil Procedure Banking Law Enlargement of Time Noting of Charge/debenture Ex Parte Application Duplicate Application Companies Registry Filing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

M Oriental Bank Limited

1st Applicant

Kailash Concrete Enterprises Limited

2nd Applicant

Procedural Posture

Civil Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Notice of Motion

  1. 1 Whether the court should enlarge time to note the debenture dated 15 September 2025 over motor vehicle KDU 350V
  2. 2 Whether the application was competent given that the same issue had already been determined by prior orders dated 23 December 2025

Ratio Decidendi

The application was declined because the issue of enlargement of time to note the debenture had already been considered and determined by the court in orders made on 23 December 2025; the present motion was therefore unnecessary and redundant.

Court Disposition

Application effectively dismissed/declined as already determined.

Orders

  • The court noted that the issue had already been determined vide orders dated 23 December 2025.
  • No fresh enlargement order was granted in this ruling.