https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/11257
The Court found that the Applicants were Kenyan, married, financially capable, and suitable adoptive parents; the Child had been abandoned, police efforts to trace the parents failed, and the Child had been validly declared free for adoption. The Guardian ad Litem and government social welfare reports were positive,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] KEHC 11257 (KLR)
- Parties
- 1st Applicant: Bwn; 2nd Applicant: Rmm; Minor/child: Baby JM; Proposed Legal Guardian: SIN; Proposed Legal Guardian: PWM; Guardian Ad Litem: PNM
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause E079 of 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment on Originating Summons for Adoption
- Outcome
- Originating Summons allowed; adoption granted
- Judges
- ["CJ Kendagor"]
- Legal Topics
- Joint Adoption by Married Kenyan Couple, Best Interests of the Child, Abandoned Child Declared Free for Adoption, Appointment of Legal Guardians, Post Adoption Registration and Birth Certificate Issuance
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bwn
1st Applicant
Rmm
2nd Applicant
Baby JM
Minor/child
SIN
Proposed Legal Guardian
PWM
Proposed Legal Guardian
PNM
Guardian Ad Litem
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment on Originating Summons for Adoption
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Applicants met the legal requirements to adopt Baby JM
- 2 Whether the proposed adoption serves the best interests of the Child
- 3 Whether the Child is eligible for adoption as a Kenyan child declared free for adoption
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the Applicants were Kenyan, married, financially capable, and suitable adoptive parents; the Child had been abandoned, police efforts to trace the parents failed, and the Child had been validly declared free for adoption. The Guardian ad Litem and government social welfare reports were positive, showing the Child had bonded well and was being properly cared for. Applying the constitutional and statutory best-interests test, the Court held that the adoption should be allowed and the proposed legal guardians appointed.
Court Disposition
Originating Summons allowed; adoption granted
Orders
- BWN and RMM are authorized to adopt Baby JM
- Upon adoption, the Child shall be known as RNW
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
In re JM (Minor) (Adoption Cause E079 of 2026) [2026] KEHC 11257 (KLR) (Family) (22 July 2026) (Judgment) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 11257 (KLR) Republic of Kenya In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts) Family Adoption Cause E079 of 2026 CJ Kendagor, J July 22, 2026 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR ADOPTION OF BABY JM, A MINOR In the matter of Bwn 1st Applicant Rmm 2nd Applicant Judgment 1.Before this Court is the application dated 20th April, 2026. The Applicants BWN and RMM are seeking to be authorized to adopt Baby JM hereinafter referred to as (“the Child”) and upon adoption, the Child is to be known as RNW. SIN and PWM are to be appointed as the Child’s legal guardians upon the granting of the adoption orders. 2.The Applicants are Kenyan citizens, as evidenced by their National Identity Cards and are married, as evidenced by their marriage certificate, license number 25xxx3. 3.The 1st Applicant is a commercial farmer while the 2nd Applicant is a tax officer. The report from the Ministry of Gender, Culture and Children’s Services (Kajiado County) dated 6th June, 2026 indicates that the Applicants are financially stable and have a regular source of income to enable them to cater for the material needs of the child. They have presented their financial statements and payslips. 4.The family has undergone background checks, and reports from the Ministry of Gender, Culture and Children’s Services and the appointed Guardian ad Litem (PNM) indicate they are eligible to adopt. They have indicated that they would like to legalise their relationship through adoption to enable the Child to become a complete member of the family. 5.The report from the Ministry of Gender, Culture and Children’s Services (Nairobi County) dated 6th June 2026 indicates that the adoption is a joint application by a Kenyan couple. The Child was found abandoned by his biological mother at Narok County Referral Hospital in Narok Town. The final police letter dated 21st March 2024 states that the child had not been claimed and neither had the parents been traced. Consequently, the child was declared free for adoption on 11th December, 2025 vide Certificate serial number 00xxx3. 6.Pending hearing of the application before this Court, PNM was appointed as Guardian ad Litem of the Child. She gave a positive report averring that the child has adjusted and bonded well with the Applicants, is in good health, happy and well cared for by the prospective parents who have sufficient means and capability to provide for the child. 7.SIN and PWM, the proposed legal guardians, are both Kenyan citizens as evidenced by their National Identity Cards. 8.The Child is presumed to be a Kenyan citizen by virtue of Article 14(4) of the Constitution, having been found in Kenya and with his parents unknown at the time of his rescue. 9.In light of the best interests of the Child principle provided for under Article 53 (2) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010. Sections 8 (1), (2) and (3) of the Children’s Act No. 29 of 2022 and the 1st Schedule of the Children’s Act No. 29 of 2022, this Court has an obligation to prioritize the Child’s best interests in making decisions touching on him.a.Article 53 of the Constitution, 2010 states that a Child’s best interests are of paramount importance in every matter concerning the Child.b.Sections 8 (1), (2) and (3) of the Children’s Act No. 29 of 2022 provides as follows;1.In all actions concerning Children, whether undertaken by public of private social welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies:a.The best interests of the Child shall be the primary consideration;b.The best interests of the Child shall include, but shall not be limited to the considerations set out in the First Schedule.2.All judicial and administrative institutions, and all persons acting in the name of such institutions, when exercising any powers conferred under this Act or any other written law, shall treat the interests of the Child as the first and paramount consideration to the extent that this is consistent with adopting a course of action calculated to :-a.safeguard and promote the rights and welfare of the Child;b.conserve and promote the welfare of the Child; andc.secure for the Child such guidance and correction as is necessary for the welfare of the Child, and in public interest.3.In any matters affecting a Child, the Child shall be accorded an opportunity to express their opinion, and that opinion shall be taken into account in appropriate cases, having regard to the Child’s age and degree of maturity.c.The First Schedule as provided for under Section 8 (1) of the Children’s Act No. 29 of 2022 provides best interests considerations to be as follows:1.The age, maturity, stage of development, gender, background and any other relevant characteristics of the Child.2.Distinct special needs (if any) arising from chronic ailment or disability.3.The relationship of the Child with the Child’s parent(s) and/or guardian(s) and any other persons who may significantly affect the Child’s welfare.4.The preference of the Child, if old enough to express a meaningful preference.5.The duration and adequacy of the Child’s current living arrangements and the desirability of maintaining continuity.6.The stability of any proposed living arrangements for the Child.7.The motivation of the parties involved and their capacities to give the Child love, affection and guidance.8.The Child’s adjustment to the Child’s present home, school and community.9.The capacity of each parent or guardian to allow and encourage frequent and continuing contact between the Child and the other parent and/or guardian(s), including physical access.10.The capacity of each parent and/or guardian(s) to cooperate or to learn to cooperate in Child care.11.Methods for assisting parental and/or guardian cooperation and resolving disputes and each parent’s/guardian’s willingness to use those methods.12.The effect of the Child if one parent/guardian has sole authority over the Child’s upbringing.13.The existence of domestic abuse between the parents/guardian (s), in the past or currently, and how that abuse affects the emotional stability and physical safety of the Child.14.The existence of any history of Child abuse by a parent and/or guardian(s); or anyone residing in the same dwelling as the Child.15.Where the Child is under one year of age, whether the Child is being breast-fed.16.The existence of a parent’s(s) or guardian’s(s) conviction for a sex offense or a sexually violent offense under the Sexual Offences Act.17.Where there is a person residing with a parent or guardian, whether that person; -a.Has been convicted of a crime under this Act, the Sexual Offences Act, the Penal Code or any other legislation.b.Has been adjudicated of a juvenile offence which, if the person had been an adult at the time of the offence, the person would have been convicted of a felony.18.Any other factor which may have a direct or indirect effect on the physical and psychological well -being of the Child. 10.The report from the Ministry of Gender, Culture and Children’s Services (Nairobi County), the guardian ad litem, and the proposed legal guardians all indicate that the Child will be well taken care of in the care and custody of the adoptive parents. 11.The Applicants have demonstrated dedication to the Child’s overall well-being, including meeting his basic needs and providing love. I believe this adoption presents the Child with a meaningful chance for a better quality of life. 12.In the circumstances, I allow the Originating Summons dated 20th April, 2026 and make the following orders:a.The Applicants, BWN and RMM, are authorized to adopt the Child known as Baby JM.b.Upon adoption, the Child shall be known as RNW.c.SIN and PWM are appointed as the legal guardians of the Child.d.The Registrar of Births and Deaths is directed to issue a birth certificate in the Child’s new name;e.The Registrar General is directed to make the relevant entries in the Adopted Children’s Register in respect of the Child.f.The guardian ad litem is hereby discharged. 13.It is so ordered. DATED, DELIVERED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI ON THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2026................................C. KENDAGORJUDGEIn the presence of:Court Assistant: Beryl