https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/12079
The Court found that the Applicants were eligible, the Child had been declared free for adoption, the reports were positive, and the proposed placement would advance the Child’s welfare. Applying the constitutional and statutory best-interests test, the Court held that the adoption would improve the Child’s quality...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] KEHC 12079 (KLR)
- Parties
- 1st Applicant: HEO; 2nd Applicant: MNS; Child: Baby NN; Proposed Legal Guardian: EMA; Proposed Legal Guardian: AWK; Guardian Ad Litem: EAM
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause E020 of 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment on Originating Summons for Adoption
- Outcome
- Application allowed; adoption granted
- Judges
- ["CJ Kendagor"]
- Legal Topics
- Local Adoption, Best Interests of the Child, Guardian Ad Litem, Legal Guardianship, Presumed Citizenship of Foundling Child, Registration of Adoption, Issuance of Birth Certificate
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HEO
1st Applicant
MNS
2nd Applicant
Baby NN
Child
EMA
Proposed Legal Guardian
AWK
Proposed Legal Guardian
EAM
Guardian Ad Litem
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment on Originating Summons for Adoption
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Applicants met the legal requirements for adoption
- 2 Whether the adoption would serve the best interests of the Child
- 3 Whether the Child was free for adoption and properly identified as a Kenyan citizen
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the Applicants were eligible, the Child had been declared free for adoption, the reports were positive, and the proposed placement would advance the Child’s welfare. Applying the constitutional and statutory best-interests test, the Court held that the adoption would improve the Child’s quality of life and therefore granted the orders sought.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; adoption granted
Orders
- HEO and MNS are authorized to adopt Baby NN.
- Upon adoption, the Child shall be known as NBO.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
In re Adoption of NN (A Minor) (Adoption Cause E020 of 2026) [2026] KEHC 12079 (KLR) (Family) (23 July 2026) (Judgment) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 12079 (KLR) Republic of Kenya In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts) Family Adoption Cause E020 of 2026 CJ Kendagor, J July 23, 2026 IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT, 2022 AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR ADOPTION OF NN, A MINOR In the matter of HEO 1st Applicant MNS 2nd Applicant Judgment 1.Before this Court is the application dated 18th December, 2025. The Applicants HEO and MNS are seeking to be authorized to adopt Baby NN hereinafter referred to as (“the Child”) and upon adoption, the Child is to be known as NBO. EMA and AWK are to be appointed as the Child’s legal guardians upon the granting of the adoption orders. 2.The first Applicant is a Kenyan citizen employed in Doha, while the second Applicant is a Kenyan citizen operating her business in Kenya, as shown by their National Identity Cards. They are married, as confirmed by their marriage certificate. Both Applicants are in good health and have no criminal records. 3.The female Applicant is a business lady working as a Salonist and Tailor while the male Applicant works as a driver in Doha. The report from the Ministry of Gender, Culture and Children’s Services (Nairobi County) dated 28th April, 2026 indicates that the Applicants have a stable household income. They have presented their financial statements and assets. 4.The Applicants have no other person from whom consent is required. They have undergone background checks, and reports from the Ministry of Gender, Culture and Children’s Services and the appointed Guardian Ad Litem (EAM) indicate that they are eligible to adopt. They have indicated that they would like to legalise their relationship through adoption to enable the Child to become a full member of the family. 5.The report from the Ministry of Gender, Culture and Children’s Services (Nairobi County), dated 28th April, 2026, indicates that the adoption is a local adoption. The Child was born on 29th January, 2024, at [Particulars Withheld] Hospital to one IN, who abandoned the Child at the hospital. The Child was later transferred to Mbagathi Hospital after rescue, where he was intubated. The final police report dated 15th May 2025 indicates that attempts to locate the Child’s relatives were unsuccessful, and no one has come forward to claim him. The Child was declared free for adoption with Certificate serial number 1xx7, issued on 16th July 2025 by the Kenya Children’s Homes Adoption Society. 6.Pending hearing of the application before this Court, EAM was appointed as Guardian Ad Litem of the Child. She gave a positive report averring that the Applicant was a good family fit for the Child. 7.EMA and AWK, the proposed legal guardians, are an uncle and aunt respectively to the Applicants , both Kenya Citizens as evidenced by their National Identity Cards. 8.The Child is presumed to be a Kenyan citizen by virtue of Article 14(4) of the Constitution, having been found in Kenya and with his parents unknown at the time of his rescue. 9.In light of the best interests of the Child principle provided for under Article 53 (2) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010. Sections 8 (1), (2) and (3) of the Children’s Act No. 29 of 2022 and the 1st Schedule of the Children’s Act No. 29 of 2022, this Court has an obligation to prioritize the Child’s best interests in making decisions touching on him.a.Article 53 of the Constitution, 2010 states that a Child’s best interests are of paramount importance in every matter concerning the Child.b.Sections 8 (1), (2) and (3) of the Children’s Act No. 29 of 2022 provides as follows;1.In all actions concerning Children, whether undertaken by public of private social welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies:a.The best interests of the Child shall be the primary consideration;b.The best interests of the Child shall include, but shall not be limited to the considerations set out in the First Schedule.2.All judicial and administrative institutions, and all persons acting in the name of such institutions, when exercising any powers conferred under this Act or any other written law, shall treat the interests of the Child as the first and paramount consideration to the extent that this is consistent with adopting a course of action calculated to:-a.safeguard and promote the rights and welfare of the Child;b.conserve and promote the welfare of the Child; andc.secure for the Child such guidance and correction as is necessary for the welfare of the Child, and in public interest.3.In any matters affecting a Child, the Child shall be accorded an opportunity to express their opinion, and that opinion shall be taken into account in appropriate cases, having regard to the Child’s age and degree of maturity.c.The First Schedule as provided for under Section 8 (1) of the Children’s Act No. 29 of 2022 provides best interests considerations to be as follows:1.The age, maturity, stage of development, gender, background and any other relevant characteristics of the Child.2.Distinct special needs (if any) arising from chronic ailment or disability.3.The relationship of the Child with the Child’s parent(s) and/or guardian(s) and any other persons who may significantly affect the Child’s welfare.4.The preference of the Child, if old enough to express a meaningful preference.5.The duration and adequacy of the Child’s current living arrangements and the desirability of maintaining continuity.6.The stability of any proposed living arrangements for the Child.7.The motivation of the parties involved and their capacities to give the Child love, affection and guidance.8.The Child’s adjustment to the Child’s present home, school and community.9.The capacity of each parent or guardian to allow and encourage frequent and continuing contact between the Child and the other parent and/or guardian(s), including physical access.10.The capacity of each parent and/or guardian(s) to cooperate or to learn to cooperate in Child care.11.Methods for assisting parental and/or guardian cooperation and resolving disputes and each parent’s/guardian’s willingness to use those methods.12.The effect of the Child if one parent/guardian has sole authority over the Child’s upbringing.13.The existence of domestic abuse between the parents/guardian(s), in the past or currently, and how that abuse affects the emotional stability and physical safety of the Child.14.The existence of any history of Child abuse by a parent and/or guardian(s); or anyone residing in the same dwelling as the Child.15.Where the Child is under one year of age, whether the Child is being breast - fed.16.The existence of a parent’s(s) or guardian’s(s) conviction for a sex offense or a sexually violent offense under the Sexual Offences Act.17.Where there is a person residing with a parent or guardian, whether that person; -a.Has been convicted of a crime under this Act, the Sexual Offences Act, the Penal Code or any other legislation.b.Has been adjudicated of a juvenile offence which, if the person had been an adult at the time of the offence, the person would have been convicted of a felony.18.Any other factor which may have a direct or indirect effect on the physical and psychological well -being of the Child. 10.The report from the Ministry of Gender, Culture and Children’s Services (Nairobi County), the guardian ad litem, and the proposed legal guardian all indicate that the Child will be well taken care of in the care and custody of the adoptive parents. 11.I am convinced that this adoption offers the Child an opportunity for an improved quality of life. 12.In the circumstances, I allow the Originating Summons dated 18th December, 2025 and make the following orders:a.The Applicants, HEO and NMS, are authorized to adopt the Child known as Baby NN.b.Upon adoption, the Child shall be known as NBO.c.The Child is presumed to be a Kenyan citizen by birth, and his date of birth is declared to be 29th January 2024, with the place of birth being Nairobi County.d.EMA and AWK are appointed as the legal guardians of the Child.e.The Registrar General is directed to make the relevant entries in the Adopted Children’s Register in respect of the Child.f.The Registrar of Births and Deaths is directed to issue a birth certificate in the Child’s new name;g.The guardian ad litem is hereby discharged. 13.It is so ordered. DATED, DELIVERED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI ON THIS 23RD DAY OF JULY 2026.………………………C. KENDAGORJUDGEIn the presence of:Court Assistant: Beryl