https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/8611
The court found that the Applicants were suitable adoptive parents and that the Child’s welfare would be best served by the adoption. The reports on the Child’s background and the Applicants’ capability satisfied the court that the statutory and constitutional best-interests test was met, justifying the adoption...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] KEHC 8611 (KLR)
- Parties
- 1st Applicant: MNM; 2nd Applicant: ANK; Child / Minor: Baby TB; Proposed Legal Guardian: BMM; Proposed Legal Guardian: PMM
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause E046 of 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Originating Summons allowed
- Judges
- ["CJ Kendagor"]
- Legal Topics
- Minor Adoption, Best Interests of the Child, Kenyan Citizenship by Birth, Appointment of Legal Guardians, Adopted Children’s Register, Birth Registration
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MNM
1st Applicant
ANK
2nd Applicant
Baby TB
Child / Minor
BMM
Proposed Legal Guardian
PMM
Proposed Legal Guardian
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Applicants met the legal requirements for adoption of the minor.
- 2 Whether the adoption was in the best interests of the Child.
- 3 Whether the Child should be declared a Kenyan citizen by birth.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Applicants were suitable adoptive parents and that the Child’s welfare would be best served by the adoption. The reports on the Child’s background and the Applicants’ capability satisfied the court that the statutory and constitutional best-interests test was met, justifying the adoption orders and the ancillary orders on citizenship, guardianship, and registration.
Court Disposition
Originating Summons allowed
Orders
- MNM and ANK are authorized to adopt Baby TB.
- Upon adoption, the Child shall be known as DMN.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
In re TB (Minor) (Adoption Cause E046 of 2026) [2026] KEHC 8611 (KLR) (Family) (18 June 2026) (Judgment) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 8611 (KLR) Republic of Kenya In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts) Family Adoption Cause E046 of 2026 CJ Kendagor, J June 18, 2026 N THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT, 2022 AND IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION FOR ADOPTION OF BABY TB (A MINOR) In the matter of MNM 1st Applicant ANK 2nd Applicant Judgment 1.Before this Court is the application dated 17th February, 2026. The Applicants MNM and ANK are seeking to be authorized to adopt Baby TB hereinafter referred to as (“the Child”) and upon adoption, the Child is to be known as DMN. BMM and PMM were proposed for appointment as the Child’s legal guardians upon granting of the adoption orders. 2.The Applicants are married, as is evidenced by their marriage certificate. The Applicants’ financial capacity and ability to provide for the Child is evidenced by their bank statements. Their health status is good, as evidenced by their medical reports, and they have no previous criminal record, as evidenced by police clearance certificates issued by the Directorate of Criminal Investigations. They pursued adoption driven by their wish to grow their family and care for a child. 3.The proposed legal guardians, BMM and PMM, are a married couple and are related to the Applicants. BMM is a brother of the 1st Applicant. They confirmed that they had consented to serve as legal guardians and that they understood the role they were taking on. 4.The report from the Ministry of Gender, Culture and Children Services State Department for Children Services (Nairobi County) dated 5th May, 2026 indicates that the Child is male. His biological parents are unknown, as he was found abandoned. The Child was declared free for adoption on 9th June, 2025 by Buckner Kenya Adoption Services vide freeing Certificate Serial Number xxxx. 5.The Child is presumed to be a Kenyan citizen by birth by virtue of Article 14 (4) of the Constitution, having been found in Kenya at the time of his rescue, with his nationality and parents unknown. 6.In light of the best interests of the Child principle provided for under Article 53 (2) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010. Sections 8 (1), (2) and (3) of the Children’s Act No. 29 of 2022 and the 1st Schedule of the Children’s Act No. 29 of 2022, this Court has an obligation to prioritize the Child’s best interests in making decisions touching on her.a.Article 53 of the Constitution, 2010 states that a Child’s best interests are of paramount importance in every matter concerning the Child.b.Sections 8 (1), (2) and (3) of the Children’s Act No. 29 of 2022 provides as follows;(1)In all actions concerning Children, whether undertaken by public of private social welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies:(a)The best interests of the Child shall be the primary consideration;(b)The best interests of the Child shall include, but shall not be limited to the considerations set out in the First Schedule.(2)All judicial and administrative institutions, and all persons acting in the name of such institutions, when exercising any powers conferred under this Act or any other written law, shall treat the interests of the Child as the first and paramount consideration to the extent that this is consistent with adopting a course of action calculated to: -(a)safeguard and promote the rights and welfare of the Child;(b)conserve and promote the welfare of the Child; and(c)secure for the Child such guidance and correction as is necessary for the welfare of the Child, and in public interest.(3)In any matters affecting a Child, the Child shall be accorded an opportunity to express their opinion, and that opinion shall be taken into account in appropriate cases, having regard to the Child’s age and degree of maturity.c.The First Schedule as provided for under Section 8 (1) of the Children’s Act No. 29 of 2022 provides best interests considerations to be as follows:(1)The age, maturity, stage of development, gender, background and any other relevant characteristics of the Child.(2)Distinct special needs (if any) arising from chronic ailment or disability.(3)The relationship of the Child with the Child’s parent(s) and/or guardian(s) and any other persons who may significantly affect the Child’s welfare.(4)The preference of the Child, if old enough to express a meaningful preference.(5)The duration and adequacy of the Child’s current living arrangements and the desirability of maintaining continuity.(6)The stability of any proposed living arrangements for the Child.(7)The motivation of the parties involved and their capacities to give the Child love, affection and guidance.(8)The Child’s adjustment to the Child’s present home, school and community.(9)The capacity of each parent or guardian to allow and encourage frequent and continuing contact between the Child and the other parent and/or guardian(s), including physical access.(10)The capacity of each parent and/or guardian(s) to cooperate or to learn to cooperate in Child care.(11)Methods for assisting parental and/or guardian cooperation and resolving disputes and each parent’s/guardian’s willingness to use those methods.(12)The effect of the Child if one parent/guardian has sole authority over the Child’s upbringing.(13)The existence of domestic abuse between the parents/guardian(s), in the past or currently, and how that abuse affects the emotional stability and physical safety of the Child.(14)The existence of any history of Child abuse by a parent and/or guardian(s); or anyone residing in the same dwelling as the Child.(15)Where the Child is under one year of age, whether the Child is being breast-fed.(16)The existence of a parent’s(s) or guardian’s(s) conviction for a sex offense or a sexually violent offense under the Sexual Offences Act.(17)Where there is a person residing with a parent or guardian, whether that person; -(a)Has been convicted of a crime under this Act, the Sexual Offences Act, the Penal Code or any other legislation.(b)Has been adjudicated of a juvenile offence which, if the person had been an adult at the time of the offence, the person would have been convicted of a felony.(18)Any other factor which may have a direct or indirect effect on the physical and psychological well-being of the Child. 7.The report from the Ministry of Gender, Culture and Children Services State Department for Children Services (Nairobi County), the report from Buckner Kenya Adoption Services, the guardian ad litem and the proposed legal guardian indicate that the Child is well known to the adoptive parents and that he will be well taken care of in their care and custody. 8.I find that this adoption is in the best interest of the Child. 9.In the circumstances, I allow the Originating Summons dated 17th February, 2026 and make the following orders:(a)The Applicants MNM and ANK are authorized to adopt the Child known as TB.(b)Upon adoption, the Child shall be known as DMN.(c)The Child is declared to be a Kenyan citizen by birth and is entitled to all rights and benefits under the Constitution of Kenya, 2010 and all applicable laws.(d)BMM and PMM are appointed as legal guardians of the Child.(e)The Registrar General is directed to make the relevant entries in the Adopted Children’s Register in respect of the Child.(f)The Registrar of births and deaths is directed to issue a birth certificate in respect of the Child’s new name.(g)The guardian ad litem is hereby discharged. 10.It is so ordered. DATED, DELIVERED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THROUGH THE MICROSOFT TEAMS ONLINE PLATFORM ON THIS 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026.……………………C. KENDAGORJUDGEIn the presence of:Court Assistant: BerylMs. Adhiambo holding brief for Moranga, Advocate for the Applicant.